AI Agents for DCF Valuation

For the Kenvue deal, please send over the below draft figures for pre-deal target multiples for FY24. Utilize potential median deal value Return to me a message with: Deal value/EBITDA, Deal value/EBIT, and Deal value/OpFCF. Round all values to one decimal place.

KVUE's cost of debt is updated to be the risk-free rate plus 100 basis points. Reply to me with KVUE's enterprise value, rounded to the nearest whole number in millions. Use the following situation to calculate the values: - Replace risk-free rate with the 10-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 0.75 - Replace risk-free rate with the 10-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 1.00 - Replace risk-free rate with the 30-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 0.75 - Replace risk-free rate with the 30-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 1.00

Update the base-case DCF model of KVUE with U.S. total equity risk premium of 4.33%, the risk free rate with the 5-Year Treasury rate and the KVUE Close share price on 2025-12-15. Let's measure the impact of an increase in tax rate by 4 percentage points (apply to 2025E-2029E and the WACC tax shield) and the decrease in terminal growth rate by 0.25 percentage points. Reply back to me, giving the updated enterprise value, equity value and implied share price, rounded to two decimal places. Express enterprise value and equity value in millions.

Use the DCF model, and make the following changes: - update net sales growth rate in 2029E to be the 2023A actual figure - update long-term growth rate to the 30-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 minus 100 basis points Reply here with the terminal value. Round it to the nearest whole number in millions.

If you updated the long-term growth rate in the DCF model to be the percentage increase in CPI in 2025 from January 1, 2025 to November 1, 2025, what is the updated implied share price? Also, increase WACC by 60bps and update sales growth to 0.5% every year for the projection period to get your answer. Round it to two decimal places. Write out your answer here.

Please audit the financials of the smallest company in our Refined Comps table by market cap using only the IS, CFS, and BS from sec filings and data tools available to you. Report Adjusted EBITDA and EV in thousands of dollars. Report EV/EBITDA to two decimal points. Calculate the following, and report it back to me with a message here: - Adjusted TTM EBITDA including SBC addback - Adjusted TTM EBITDA excluding SBC addback - EV as of 12/17/25 (use basic weighted-average shares from the latest 10-Q and include all lease liabilities) - EV / adjusted TTM EBITDA (incl SBC) - EV / adjusted TTM EBITDA (excl SBC) Note: Adjusted EBITDA defined as operating income and cash-flow non-cash addbacks, excluding non-cash operating lease cost.

Reply back to me with the following values: - Implied share price. - Enterprise value - % weight of PV of terminal value in the total new EV. To get to the right answer, update the WACC calculation in the DCF model: replace the risk-free rate with the 5-year Treasury rate as of Dec 15, 2025, and use 4.33% as the total equity risk premium for the United States of America. Then, apply the following changes for the forecast years 2025E-2029E: reduce the operating margin by 2 percentage points in each forecast year, set the yearly revenue growth rate to 1.22% in each forecast year, and set CAPEX equal to D&A in each forecast year. Keep everything else the same. When you reply, round the values to two decimal places, express in $millions.

Please calculate the implied premium / discount of the offer price as proposed to the client relative to the following KVUE share prices, using the values up to 12/08/2025: - Closing price on the final day - 52 week high closing price - 52 week low closing price - last 30 trading day VWAP - last 90 trading day VWAP Report percentages to one decimal place. Use unadjusted prices and calculate VWAP based on the daily closing prices. All dates are in MM/DD/YYYY format. Reply back with your answer here.

Reply back to me with the P/E ratio for KVUE, rounded to two decimal points. Use the implied share price in the DCF model and diluted EPS from the annual financials dated 12/23/2025.

From the figures in merger model, please recalculate the stock portion of the offering price (exchange ratio with 5 decimals) using Kimberly-Clark unadjusted closing share price at 31 Oct 25, and then derive the deal implied Kenvue market price per share at 16 Dec 25. What are the dollar spreads of Kenvue's unadjusted closing price (16 Dec 25) relative to this implied price? Print your final answer to me here. Give it to me as dollars and cents.

Calculate the unlevered beta for Haleon (HLN) using Total Debt and Market Capitalization as of the end of FY2024. Assume 0.227 levered beta for HLN and a 21% Tax rate. Using the unlevered beta for HLN computed above, and the debt and equity values in the model, re-leverage the Beta for Kenvue and update the WACC with the new Re-levered Beta. Reply back with a message, giving the following results: - the New WACC - the New Implied Share Price. - the Variance in $ for Share Price (New-Original) Round all outputs to two decimal places.

Update the DCF model to tell us the following: - Assume operating margin % from 2025E-2029E is updated to KVUE's 2019 operating margin plus 50 basis points - Add 25 basis points to terminal growth rate I want to know the implied share price, rounded to two decimal places. Can you tell me here?

Update the DCF model with the following changes - tax rate for the entire projection period (2025E-2029E) and the WACC build is now the implied tax rate from the second quarter of 2023, calculated as income tax expense over revenue, plus 10% - update beta to 1 - assume revenue growth rate in the projection period matches that of 2024A plus 75 basis points. - update terminal growth rate to be equal to the updated monthly revenue growth rate plus 50 basis points - assume final gross debt is increased by 50% and cash balance is now 10% of the absolute increased gross debt number What is equity value in millions rounded to the nearest whole number? Print your answer back to me as a short message.

In a hypothetical acquisition of Kenvue by Kimberly Clark (merger), at what Kimberly Clark share price would accretion for Pro Forma 2025 EPS for the combined company (Kenvue and Kimberly Clark) would be exactly 0.00%? Assume KVUE' share price before applying a premium is the average closing daily price between 1/1/2025 and 06/30/2025. All other assumptions in the base merger model should not be changed. Return your result as a message, give it in dollars with 2 decimal places.

Take the average close price for KVUE for the week of 12/15/2025 to 12/19/2025, apply a 10% premium, and input that figure in the DCF model. Re-calculate both the 1) cost of equity and 2) after-tax cost of debt. Output your answer as a reply here, rounded to two decimal points.

Replace the risk-free rate in the DCF model with the average of the 10 year and 20 year treasury rates as of 12/22/2025, and assume that the cost of debt is this average value plus 150 basis points. Finally, assume that the tax rate is revised up by 50 basis points for the projection period. What is the absolute difference in terminal value in the original calculation and this updated one? Output your result as a reply here, with millions rounded to two decimal places.

Please get the most recent financial year’s EV/FCF multiples (cutoff date 20 Dec 2025) for the public comparables, as per the slides deck, to calculate a cleaned average using the Modified z-score (Median + MAD) approach, with cutoff = 3.0 for outliers (use the standard scaling constant). Then, use this average as exit multiple to calculate terminal value (TV) and baseline EV for Kenvue. What is the implied share price and the difference relative to the initial implied share price as per the DCF model? For final answers, round TV and EV in nearest million, share price and multiples to two decimal places. Carry full precision for intermediate calculations. Print your answer to me here.

Update KVUE's share price to the closing price as of 1/5/26 and 2029E revenue growth rate to that of 2025E. What is discounted free cash flow in 2029E, including terminal value, rounded to the nearest whole number in millions? I want you to reply with your findings in here. To get the right answer, in the WACC build, assume that KVUE is able to refinance its outstanding debt to the following interest rates: - anything 2030 and shorter is the 5 year treasury rate as of 1/5/26 plus 50 basis points - anything 2033 and longer is the 10 year treasury rate as of 1/5/26 plus 50 basis points

Please run an upside DCF scenario for Kenvue assuming slightly better revenue growth and margins changing the following metrics: 1. Revise 2025E revenue growth rate to 2% stepping up by 0.1% per year until 2029E. 2. Increase existing 2025E – 2029E operating margins by 0.1%. 3. Increase D&A as a % of Net Sales by 0.1% in 2025E, and hold the resulting value flat for 2026E–2029E 4. Increase Operating Current Assets as % of Net Sales in 2025E to 2024A + 0.1% stepping up by 0.1% per year until 2029E. 5. Increase Operating Current Liabilities as % of Net Sales in 2025E to 2024A +0.1% stepping up by 0.1% per year until 2029E. Revise the following financial metrics: 6. Update the WACC calculation in the DCF model by using the 10-year Treasury rate as of Dec 12, 2025 7. Reduce the cost of debt by 0.1%. 8. Add 0.1% to the terminal growth rate. Output the following 1. The revised WACC incorporating the above changes. 2. Difference in the sum of unlevered free cash flow from 2025E – 2029E between the model with the above changes and the original model 3. Difference in terminal value between the model with the above changes and the original model 4. Difference in enterprise value between the model with the above changes and the original model 5. % change in enterprise value between the model with the above changes and the original model 6. Revised implied share price in the model with the above changes 7. % change in revised implied share price between the model with the above changes and the original model Round the implied share price and % values to 2 decimal places and all other values to 0 decimal places. Reply to me with your answer here.

Using the REIT model, consider the following assumptions for the projected period between 2025 to 2029: 1) Assume the revenue growth for its service business equivalent to the overall company revenue growth 2) Assume that the EBITDA margin for the service business is 5 percentage points higher than the company EBITDA margin during the same forecast period 3) Assume depreciation equivalent to 2% of the annual revenues 4) Assume capex equal to 3% of the annual revenue 5) Assume investment in working capital equal to 1.5% of the annual revenue 6) Assume the effective tax rate is equal to 21% 7) Assume that the spin-off is done on a debt free, cash free basis 8) Assume the valuation date as of December 31, 2024 9) Assume a cost of equity of 12% and a terminal growth rate of 1% post the projected period. Compute the levered free cash flows and the implied equity value of its service business. Round all the values up to two decimals: - Cumulative Levered Free Cash Flows (2025 - 2029) - Terminal Value - Equity Value of the service business Reply here.

Perform a DCF analysis for Golden Everest using the REIT model with the following parameters: - Hold EBITDA margin constant at 42% throughout the projection period - Hold Capex % of Revenue constant at 22% throughout the projection period - Assume a WACC of 9% - Assume Terminal Value is equal to 11 times final projection year EBITDA - Assume Net Debt is as given for 2024A - End-of-year discounting (not mid-year convention) Give me your reply showing the Golden Everest Equity Value in $ millions, rounded to the nearest million.

Using the REIT model re-calculate the Implied REIT Price Per Share using the the 25th Percentile EV/EBITDA and 2025E Revenue Growth percentage of 5%. Return to me right here the price in $ for the same case used in the Executive Summary tab. Round to 2 decimal points.

Forecast operational expenses are impacted by a rising inflation of 2% in the REIT model. The increase is able to be passed on only for Services revenues. Assume the proportion of operating expenses deriving from Service revenue is equal to its proportion of total revenue in 2024. Calculate the inflation-adjusted enterprise value and target share price in 2025 for Golden Everest based on REIT industry capitalization rate of 5.5%. Print the answer here. Present monetary values in $ million rounded to nearest whole number, and share prices in $ to 2 decimal places.

Calculate which data center company in the peer group has generated the strongest revenue growth, and highest Adjusted EBITDA margins over 2022-2024. 1. Only analyze the period of 2022-2024 2. Rank each company in the peer group on their revenue growth from 2021-2024 (CAGR) 3. Rank each company in the peer group on their EBITDA margin 4. The company with the highest average ranking of the two metrics is considered the strongest, if there is a tie, the company with the largest increase in EBITDA margin (absolute percentage point increase from 2022 to 2024) is considered stronger 5. Adjusted EBITDA should be calculated by taking net income and adding back income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization 6. Three companies should be analyzed: American Tower, Equinix, Digital Realty 7. For American Tower, only utilize financials from the data center portion of the business from 2022-2024 for calculations Tell me the strongest company; and return the averages of all the companies for: 1. annualized revenue growth, 2. average Adjusted EBITDA Margin, and 3. adjusted EBITDA margin increase. All percentages should be rounded to 2 decimal places. Print the answer here.

In the existing sheet for the REIT model, create a sensitivity table for 2029E Net Income. Show Revenue Growth Step-up at 50 basis points and 100 basis points. Show EBITDA Margin Step-up at 20 basis points and 40 basis points. Round all final numbers to the nearest million. To calculate the correct values, assume that revenue growth in 2025E starts at 8.0% and increases by the same amount every year of the projection period, referred to as the "Revenue Growth Step-up". Assume that EBITDA Margin % starts at 44.0% and increases by the same amount every year of the projection period, referred to as the "EBITDA Margin Step-up".

Using the 'Projections (C-Corp)' tab in Golden_Everest_REIT_Analysis compute the Net Income for 2029E given the following scenario: - Assume tax rates are 15.0% for 2025E through 2029E - If net income exceeds $1,300M in a given year, update the revenue growth % for all subsequent years. - Use the average of the growth rates shown on the "Projected Financials" slide in the Project_Titan_Presentation v3.pptx file. Compare the 2029E Net Income computed for the above scenario to the original 2029E Net Income by providing each Net Income figure and their dollar difference. Present in $M and round to nearest whole number. Write back your answers as a message.

Calculate the price per share that a strategic buyer would need to offer for Golden Everest to consider an acquisition instead of a REIT conversion. Reply to me here with the minimum required share price. Round all final numbers to two decimal places. I want the 2027 expected share price discounted to 11/21/2025 (18 months) for “C-Corp Low”, “C-Corp Mid”, “C-Corp High”, “REIT Low”, “REIT Mid”, and “REIT High”. Assumptions: 1. It will take 18 months post REIT conversion for the stock to appreciate to fair value, assuming mid-2027 for this process to complete. 2. The discount rate is 4%. 3. Use the low, mid, and high multiples found in the model. 4. Assume the price needed to consider the acquisition is 10% above the valuation for the REIT using the mid multiple. 5. Reference 2025E EV/EBITDA multiples for C-Corp and REIT conversion, and pull 2027E EBITDA values from the model.

Calculate Unlevered Free Cash Flow in 2025E, 2026E, 2027E, 2028E and 2029E. In the Golden Everest Financial Model, there is an error in the unlevered free cash flow build in the Projections, "Projections (C-Corp)", tab. Please use the correct formula to calculate Unlevered Free Cash Flow based on the Projections. Additionally, use the following assumptions: - Change in Working Capital: -1.0% of Revenues between 2025E and 2029E - D&A: 11.50% of Revenues in 2025E and 12.0% of Revenues from 2026E through 2029E - Capex: 24.0% of Revenues in 2025E, 22.0% of Revenues in 2026E, 21.0% of Revenues in 2027E, and 20% of Revenues in 2028E and 2029E Round output financial figures to 2 decimal points. $ must be in millions. Give me your response as a reply right here.

Model out the NPV of distributions shareholders would receive under REIT conversion. - There's the $1.2 billion E&P purge that gets taxed as ordinary income at 37% (E&P purge occurs at Year 0, annual distributions occur at end of Years 1–5). - There are ongoing REIT dividends in the $650-750mm range that qualify for the 20% Section 199A deduction. - Apply 199A only to annual REIT distributions; do not apply 199A to the E&P purge (tax purge at 37%). - Run sensitivities across 10%, and 12% discount rates over a 5-year horizon. Show discount rates vs distribution levels, populated with respective after-tax NPV per share. Then, show me the base case NPV as a percentage of both the strategic offer and current trading price. Round NPV per share to 2 decimal places. Round percentages to 1 decimal place. Create an xlsx that has all of your results.

Golden Everest's management team plans to issue a 10-year debenture of $3,000 million at an interest rate of 5% at the end of 2025E. Use the REIT model to model Golden Everest's year-end cash balances in 2025E, 2026E, and 2027E under C-Corp, no change in the dividend policy with the debenture. Additionally, model Golden Everest's year-end cash balances in 2025E, 2026E, and 2027E under the REIT structure and with the debenture. Assume under the REIT structure, management decides to distribute 92.5% of net income as a dividend. Write a message to me, explaining the following: - Golden Everest's year-end cash balances in 2025E, 2026E, and 2027E under C-corp structure. - Golden Everest's year-end cash balances in 2025E, 2026E, and 2027E under REIT structure. Present monetary values in $ million rounded to nearest whole number.

Calculate the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for Golden Everest. Write back your reply, accounting for the following: - Utilize the REIT structure mid case scenario for 2025E in the model. - Presume the REIT pays 90% of its taxable income. - Use the REIT's net debt level, instead of gross debt for WACC calculations, and presume the interest rate stays the same as the C-corp. - The corporate tax rate is 15% for both C-corp and REIT. - State the weighted average cost of capital as a percentage, round to 2 decimal places.

Using the REIT model, recalculate the fair value of Golden Everest with C-Corp status using a three-stage unlevered DCF. For Stage 1, use the unlevered cash flows from 2025E to 2029E on the “Projections (C-Corp)” tab. Assume the valuation date is December 1, 2025 and use the midyear adjustment approach for Stage 1, which assumes CFs are generated halfway through each period rather than at period-end for any partial periods. For Stage 2, grow unlevered FCF at a 5% annual pace for 12 years until 2041). For stage 3, use a perpetuity growth rate of 1%. Assume WACC is 11%. For present value calculations, use a 365 day count. Get me back (1) present value of stage 1 cash flows; (2) present value of stage 2 cash flows; (3) present value of terminal value; and (4) equity value per share. State all values in millions and rounded to the nearest whole number, except equity value per share, which you should show in dollars and cents. Print your reply here.

Edit the Valuation Summary tab of the REIT model, showing the implied upside/downside percentage for the Mid case of Scenario 1: Current Valuation. - EV/EBITDA multiple: use 50% and 55% of the average multiple for Data Center REITs on the Comparable Companies tab, excluding the highest and lowest companies by market cap. - Current trading price: two columns as 10% and 20% higher than the Strategic Offer share price. Assume revenue growth % is now 9% and EBITDA Margin % is now 41% for the entirety of the projection period and use 2029E EBITDA instead of 2025E EBITDA in the Mid case of Scenario 1: Current Valuation. Round to the nearest two decimal points.

I want the Output Levered FCF for 2029E, rounded to the nearest million. - Revenue growth: starts at 7.0% and increases by 0.5% per year in the projection period - EBITDA margin %: starts at 44.0% and increases by 0.1% per year in the projection period - Capex % of revenue: starts at 23.0% and decreases by 0.5% per year in the projection period - Tax rate: 20.0% every year of the projection period Use the Projections (C-Corp) tab in the REIT model. Give me the answer right back here.

Using the information in the REIT model, create a new sheet: - Re-run the Scenario3: REIT Conversion analysis in sheet "Valuation Summary" using FFO multiples in place of the current EBITDA multiples - Run a low case using Iron Mountain's FFO multiple - Run a High case using Digital Realty's FFO multiple Tell me this info for Low and High cases: - REIT Equity Value ($mm) - Implied REIT Price Per Share - Premium to Current Share price of $42.50 as of 11/21/25 Calculate Golden Everest's 2025E FFO metric by using Digital Realty's implied FFO value (from the information within the "Comparable Companies" tab ) as % of LQA Adjusted EBITDA for the period QE 3/31/2023 within the investor presentation Format all outputs as follows: - Round all dollar figures to 1 decimal place in millions ($m) and express in "$X.X" format - Round all percentages to 1 decimal place - Share price should be to two decimal places

For each year, calculate Levered FCF less Dividends Paid. Assuming a 9% discount rate, output the net present value (NPV) of Levered FCF less Dividends Paid over the projection period, rounded to a full million. Refer to REIT model and adjust Golden Everest Base Case Projections (C-Corp Status) as follows: - Hold Capex % of Revenue constant at 22% over the projection period - Assume Dividend per Share is fixed at 1.60 in 2025E, increasing 0.40 per year over the projection period. Print your answer to me here via a short message.

Using the REIT model, assess the downside REIT scenario for Golden Everest if data center REIT multiples compress 30% during a longer than expected conversion period of 12 months. Reply to me in here with a message which states the expected price in 12 months of Golden Everest in this downside scenario and the expected total return of the stock over that period. Round all numbers to 2 decimal points. Assumptions: 1. Stock price will be calculated off of 2026 expected earnings 2. Dividends are not re-invested 3. Only half of the REIT premium (post-compression) vs C-Corps will be realized over the 12 months 4. No change in net debt

Reply back to me an updated IRR and MOIC. Round final numbers to two decimal places. Use the LBO and comps models to complete the analysis. Follow these assumptions: 1. Remove any comps with Enterprise Value/EBITDA multiples that are negative or greater than 4 times the current median. 2. Calculate the new median EV/EBITDA multiple and use that value +10.00x to replace the exit multiple on the 'LBO' tab of the LBO model 3. Update the senior debt amount on the 'LBO' tab to the minimum EV/Revenue multiple on the comps document

Return the Year 1 - Year 5 CAGR for Adjusted EBITDA. Round to two decimal places and display percentages with %. Write your answer straight back. I want you to use this info to update values in the LBO model: 1. Year 2 revenue growth rate increases 50 bps vs original case 2. Cost of revenue for 'subscription' increases by 15% YoY from Year 4 to Year 5

Make adjustments to the Year 5 growth rate to reach the following Year 1 - Year 5 CAGR for Total Revenue: 22%. Use the LBO model to complete the analysis, but just reply right here. Round value to one decimal place. Make these changes: 1. Year 1 revenue growth rate increases by 188 bps 2. Year 5 revenue growth rate increase by 1/8 the current % premium

Please use the LBO model to calculate the sponsor equity value and IRR for Year 5. Then report the sponsor equity value in US dollars, rounded to the nearest million (e.g., $1,000). Also, report the IRR as a percentage rounded to one decimal place. Send me your reply here. Follow these steps: - Increase the Senior Debt leverage to 6.0x from 5.0x. - Decrease the Senior Debt interest rate to 6.0% from 7.5%. - Reflect mandatory annual amortization of the Senior Debt, calculated as 2.0% of the opening principal balance of 2,088.3. - Increase the Subordinated Debt leverage to 2.0x from 1.5x. - Decrease the Subordinated Debt interest rate to 8.0% from 10.0%.

Please assess the impact of reducing the entry premium by 5% and illustrate the potential impact on the deal return. Use the LBO model. 1. Reduce the deal premium by 5%, from 35% to 30%. 2. Reduce the Exit Multiple from 35.0x to 34.0x. 3. Ensure all interest expense calculations are based on the average of the beginning and ending debt balance in the period. Report just the MOIC and IRR %, return it back here. All percentages and multiples must be rounded to two decimal places.

Please create a new scenario within the LBO model to assess the impact on Elastic’s Net Profit, assuming that for all years over the projection period (Year 1 to Year 5), Research and Development expenses margins are 10% higher and General and Administrative expenses margins are 2% higher. In the existing file, add a new tab and show values for "Net Profit" and "Net Profit Margin", across Year 1, Year 3, and Year 5. All monetary results must be displayed in USD millions, rounded to two decimal places, and all percentages must also be rounded to two decimal points.

Benchmark the results for Elastic NV Q2'FY26 (ending 10/31/2025) against their industry peers as reported in Public Comparables (for Q2). 1. Calculate the public comparables mean (average) for Market Cap, Enterprise Value, Enterprise Value/Revenue, and Enterprise Value/EBITDA 2. State the percent by which Elastic N.V. Underperformed or Overperformed its peers average across each valuation metric Constraints you MUST follow: 1. Express all multiples to two decimal places, and include 'x' after the second decimal 2. Express Market Cap and Enterprise Value as whole numbers 3. To manage large and extreme values, apply the following for the Public Comparables: 3a. Exclude Market Cap > $1 trillion in calculating the Market Cap average 3b. Exclude Enterprise Value > $1 trillion in calculating the Enterprise Value average 3c. Exclude Negative Multiples for Enterprise Value/Revenue and Enterprise Value/EBITDA 3d. Exclude Multiples > 200.00x for Enterprise Value/EBITDA Write your reply to me here with everything that I asked for.

Assess if the sponsor can still meet the 20% IRR target at the Year 5 exit, given higher cost of revenues. 1. Increase subscription cost as % of subscription revenues by 1 percentage point in Year 1, then keep it constant in the remaining projection years. 2. Increase services cost as % of services revenues by 1 percentage point in Year 1, then keep it constant in the remaining projection years. Add a new worksheet to the Elastic NV LBO model. It must show Net Debt at Exit, Sponsor Equity Value at Exit, IRR %. All monetary results to be displayed in USD millions, rounded to two decimal places, and all percentages must be rounded to two decimal points.

Assess how much certain business drivers must move to bring IRR below 20%. The stock price has fallen to $87.00. Use the LBO model for the info. 1. Find the critical point (percentages to 2 decimal places) for each of the below business drivers at which rounded IRR would be pushed down to 19.99% from above: a) 'Growth rate scale' (correct the approach for Year 1/2) b) 'Customer acquisition costs' c) 'R&D cost' d) 'Debt costs' e) 'EBITDA multiple' Assumptions and constraints: 1. EBITDA is not to fall below $91 million for any year. If this threshold is passed the new constraint becomes EBITDA for each individual year instead of the IRR. 2. 'Debt costs' should be set to 0% for all other sensitivities. Create a new sheet that shows values for the five major business drivers.

Please create a new scenario within the LBO model to assess if the sponsor can still meet the 20% IRR target at the Year 5 exit, given higher Net Working Capital needs. 1. Increase accounts receivable as % of sale by 2 percentage points value in Year 1, then keep it constant in the remaining projection years 2. Increase prepaid expenses and other current assets as % of sale by 2 percentage points in Year 1, then keep it constant in the remaining projection years. Output: Add a new worksheet to the LBO model titled “NWC Scenario”. Add the Net Debt at Exit, Sponsor Equity Value at Exit, IRR %. All monetary results must be displayed in USD millions, rounded to two decimal places, and all percentages must also be rounded to two decimal points.

Print out here the updated IRR and MOIC, rounded to two decimal places. Use the precedent transactions document and LBO model to complete the analysis. Assumptions: 1. Adjust the LBO model to have the premium % equal to Splunk Inc's revenue growth rate in the precedent transactions document 2. Adjust year 4 revenue growth in the LBO to New Relic, Inc's revenue growth rate in the precedent transactions document

I want you to tell me for Year 1 - Year 5: (1) Total revenue CAGR(2) Subscription Cost of Revenue CAGR (3) Sales and Marketing Expenses CAGR (4) EBITDA CAGR But first adjust revenue growth rate to be 7.5% in year 1, 50 bps YoY increase to year 2, 150 bps YoY increase to year 3, 100 bps increase vs original case in year 4, and original case for year 5. Reply here, with 2 decimal points.

Run a single downside scenario where all modeled sensitivity factors receive a 20% shock, in the direction that would adversely impact IRR. What would the new IRR & Sponsor Equity Value be? Use the LBO model to answer. In the operating assumptions, update the sensitivity shocks of the major business drivers, including: a) -20% 'Growth rate scale', total revenue growth for Elastic for years 1-5 b) 20% 'Customer acquisition costs', total sales and marketing costs for years 1-5 for Elastic c) 20% 'R&D cost', the costs for research and development that Elastic is expected to pay from year 1 to 5 in the future d) 20% 'Debt costs', the interest costs that Elastic would have to pay e) -20% 'EBITDA multiple', the exit multiple that is used in determining the exit valuation Output, in a NEW tab in the existing LBO model, values for “IRR (All factors shocked by 20%)” and “Sponsor Equity Value (All factors shocked by 20%)”. Round all values to two decimal places, and display monetary values in millions ($m). I also want you to give an assessment of whether further analysis is required, based on whether the downside loses money.

Please evaluate the impact on Elastic's IRR% at exit, assuming a slowdown in Total Revenues growth. Return the following here: Year 5 Adj. EBITDA, EV value at Exit, Net Debt at Exit, Sponsor Equity Value at Exit, Sponsor Equity Value at Entry, MOIC, and IRR %. use the LBO model. Respond with your answers straight back here. Use this for your work: 1. Decrease the existing Total Revenues growth rate in Year 3 by 5% of its original value in the base case (a 5% relative decrease). 2. Decrease the existing Total Revenues growth rate in Year 4 by 10% of its original value in the base case (a 10% relative decrease). 3. Decrease the existing Total Revenues growth rate in Year 5 by 15% of its original value in the base case (a 15% relative decrease). All monetary results must be displayed in USD millions, rounded to 2 decimal places, and all percentages must also be rounded to 2 decimal points.

Use the LBO model to assess the impact of a lower interest rate environment on the Year 5 exit IRR% target. 1. Decrease the existing senior debt cost by 50 bps starting at the beginning of Year 2. The senior debt cost should remain constant thereafter. 2. Decrease the existing subordinated debt cost by 25 bps starting at the beginning of Year 3. The subordinated debt cost should remain constant thereafter. 3. Recalculate the total interest cost for the impacted projection period (Year 2 to Year 5). 4. Note that all interest expense calculations must be based on the average of the beginning and ending debt balance in the period. Tell me the Net Debt at Exit, Sponsor Equity Value at Exit, MOIC, and IRR %. Print it here. All monetary results must be displayed in USD millions, rounded to two decimal places, and all percentages and multiples must also be rounded to two decimal points.

Using the assumptions below, calculate the sponsor equity value and IRR for Year 5. Then, report the sponsor equity value in US dollars, rounded to the nearest million (e.g., $1,000). Report the IRR as a percentage rounded to one decimal place. Print your answer here. Use the LBO model with the following specifications: - Increase the Subordinated Debt leverage to 2.0x from 1.5x. - Implement mandatory annual amortization of the Subordinated Debt, calculated as 1.5% of the opening principal balance of 696.1. - For each of Years 1 through 5, calculate mandatory annual amortization on Subordinated Debt as 1.5% of the opening principal balance. - Subtract both the mandatory annual amortization and any additional paydown from the beginning Subordinated Debt balance to arrive at the ending Subordinated Debt balance for that year. - Repeat this sequence each year so that the Subordinated Debt schedule reflects both annual amortization and any paydowns across Years 1 through 5. - To determine the ending Senior Debt balance from Year 1 through Year 5, incorporate the following: - Discretionary Repayment (excess cash sweep) is calculated as 50.0% of the Available Cash for Debt Repayment. - Compute discretionary repayment as 50.0% of Available Cash for Debt Repayment and deduct this amount from the beginning balance of Senior Debt to arrive at the ending balance. - This sequence is repeated each year so the debt schedule reflects discretionary paydowns tied to Available Cash for Debt Repayment. - Each year, Total Debt Paydown should equal the sum of all Senior Debt paydowns plus both the mandatory and any additional repayments on Subordinated Debt.

Use the LBO model. I want some new analyses: - Decrease the “Premium” from 35.0% to 25.0% on the "LBO" tab - Decrease the “Adj. EBITDA Multiple” from 40.0x to 25.0x on the "LBO" tab - Update revenue growth constant at 15.0% per year from Year 2 through Year 5. Write out to me here: 1. Sponsor Equity Value in Year 5. 2. IRR in Year 5. Round it to the nearest million (e.g., $1,000). Report the IRR as % rounded to one decimal place.

Use Planet Fitness' latest financial model that Advent updated based on their specifications and assess Advent’s “ability to pay” to reach 25% IRR after 5 years if there are net revenue synergies between Planet Fitness and a portfolio company that Advent already holds. Assume exit multiple is 18x and estimated revenue synergies are as follows: $10 million per quarter (Q1-Q4 2026); $50 million per quarter (Q1-Q4 2027 and beyond). Assume no incremental costs associated with the net revenue synergies. Reply to me with a message outlining the implied premium paid to reach 25% IRR, assuming the revenue synergies above.

Planet Fitness is looking to divest its entire 281 stores, which it owns as of September 30, 2025, to a franchise owner. Round all results to two decimal places and present it in $mm. Using the LBO model, perform a DCF analysis for the company as per the base case scenario for the projected cash flows for the 281 stores, and assume the following: 1) Assume that the average revenue per store increases by 5% YoY for every quarter from Q4 2025 through the end of 2030 2) Assume EBITDA margin for the business remains at 39% every quarter from Q4 2025 through the end of 2030 2) Assume that the effective tax rate is 20% 3) Assume that the depreciation rate is 5% of the revenue 4) Assume that maintenance capex is 2% of sales and there is no growth capex 5) Assume a discount rate of 12% and terminal growth rate of 2% 6) Do the enterprise valuation as of December 31, 2025 Print here the FCFF for 2026 to 2030. Also give the Enterprise Value of the corporate-owned store business

Calculate the sponsor equity value and IRR for FY2030, then report the sponsor equity value in US dollars as a reply. Round $ to the nearest million and report the IRR % to one decimal place. 1. Reference the "Copy of LBO" tab in the LBO model for interim calculations. 2. Develop one scenario with the following specifications: -- Increase the Cash to $600 from $500 and the Minimum Cash to $100 from $50 -- Decrease the Exit Multiple from 18.0x to 15.0x -- Increase the “Secured term loan - USD tranche” leverage from 6.0x to 7.0x LTM EBITDA -- Remove the annual mandatory amortization of the "Secured term loan – USD tranche" -- Set the interest income rate assumption to 7.5% for each forecast year from FY2026 through FY2030

Conduct a 5-year IRR sensitivity analysis using Planet Fitness' latest financial model that Advent updated based on their specifications (v7). Assess the IRR impact to Advent if the terms of the debt raised changed while keeping 10% offer price premium and 18x exit multiple. Calculate the 5-year IRR when Debt Raised at Close at 6.5x, 7.0x EBITDA and interest rate at 6.5% and 7%. You can use a "Copy of LBO" tab. Round all calculated numbers to one decimal place. Reply back to me here with the information I've asked for.

Use the LBO analysis, update it to assume that Planet Fitness stock option tranches outstanding. I want to see the Year 5 IRR, flexing premium paid and exit multiple. # Assumptions -All options are vested or will vest in the event of a transaction -3 tranches of stock options outstanding: *5.0 million shares at a strike of $105.00/share *4.0 million shares at a strike of $110.00/share *5.0 million shares at a strike of $116.00/share # Output In the LBO analysis file create a new sensitivity table, with the Entry Premium % of 5% and 15%. Also show the Exit Multiple of 16x, 18x and 20x. Round final monetary values to nearest million. Round all other values to 1 decimal point.

Use Planet Fitness' latest financial model, in the"Copy of LBO" tab, and sensitize $ operating expenditure each year by +/- 5% against the base case for each year from 2026 through 2030; calculate the resultant change in FY30 IRR relative to the base case. (For illustration, if opex in FY26 was $1,000, the downside (+5% opex) case would be $1,050 opex and the upside case (- 5% opex) would be $950 opex.) Create a new Sheet and make a table with: - Rows: "Upside", "Base", "Downside" scenarios - Columns: "Scenario"; "IRR"; "Accretion/Dilution" Where "IRR" is the IRR for the given scenario and "Accretion/Dilution" is the difference in the scenario IRR against the base case in absolute % terms. Format all percentages to 2% decimal places

Using the LBO model, I want you to tell me updated values for: (1) Implied Net Debt, (2) Sponsor Equity Value and (3) IRR for Year 5. # Assumptions -Increase the interest rate of the secured term loan from 7.5% to 7.75%, and assume the secured term loan is now non-amortizing -Increase entry leverage from 6.0x LTM EBITDA to 7.25x LTM EBITDA -Hold revenue growth constant at 11.0% from FY27E through FY30E Given the revenue adjustment, throughout the forecast period, assume: - Quantum of Operating Expenses remains unchanged - Capex in this scenario scales faster than revenue and as a % of revenue increases by 100bps above the base case - Assume no $ increase to D&A For the final numbers: Percentages rounded to 1 decimal point. Monetary values rounded to the nearest whole million USD.

Calculate the sponsor equity value and IRR for FY2030, then report the sponsor equity value in US dollars, rounded to the nearest million, and report the IRR as a percentage rounded to one decimal place. Use the LBO model. Reply straight back to me please, with everything I requested. Use these specs: - Increase the “Secured term loan - USD tranche” leverage from 6.0x to 7.5x LTM EBITDA and decrease the yield from 7.50% to 6.50%. - Hold revenue growth constant at 12.0% per year from FY2026 to FY2030. - Decrease the % Premium to 5.0% from 10.0%.

Conduct a 5-year IRR sensitivity analysis using Planet Fitness' latest financial model that Advent updated based on their specifications (v7). Assess the impact if Planet Fitness reduces National advertising fund expense to 10% YoY change in Q1 to Q4 2026. Using the "Copy of LBO" tab calculate the 5-year IRR when offer prices are $100, $110 and exit multiples are 16x, 17x. Round all calculated results to one decimal place. Create a sensitivity table, and make a new Spreadsheet, with these values.

Update the LBO analysis tab "Copy of LBO". It needs to include a single potential add on acquisition in FY2027E. Assess the impacts on the 5-year LBO analysis. Use SOFR actual data. Add to that tab, the total debt, total enterprise value, and sponsor IRR. Round $ to millions and others to 1 decimal point. General assumptions: -Target EBITDA at time of acquisition is $41mm -Assume target EBITDA grows at the same CAGR as Planet Fitness standalone EBITDA forecast from 27-30 -Acquisition EBITDA multiple of 10.0x -No synergies -Acquisition funded first by all available cash on hand (less minimum cash), then by a revolver. Revolver assumptions: *The revolver was left undrawn at purchase *Priced at SOFR + 400 (for the purpose of this analysis, pricing will be fixed throughout the forecast at the 30-day Average SOFR as of 11/21 in attached file titled "SOFR (Actual).xlsx") *Maximum revolver capacity of $1,000mm *Unused revolver commitment fee of 0.25% *Revolver paydown is prioritized before cash sweep to any other debt

Update the LBO model to include an incentive payment structure of PLTF management post-transaction. Assess the impacts on the 5-year LBO analysis. Management is eligible for these payments each year of the forecast based on 3 levels of performance targets: - Minimum: Meets Currently modeled EBITDA projections - Midpoint: Exceeds EBITDA projections by 10% - Maximum: Exceeds EBITDA projections by 20% The Payout for each level: - Minimum: $2mm - Midpoint: $3mm - Maximum: $5mm Here are some assumptions: - For EBITDA outcomes that surpass one threshold but not the next, management will receive the pro-rata proportion of EBITDA in excess of the threshold, calculated linearly between the two thresholds - Create 2 new cases (in addition to the "base" case currently in the model) where revenue exceeds the base case forecast by 5% and 10% per year, respectively - For the 5% revenue outperformance case, assume capex in this scenario scales faster than revenue and as a % of revenue increases by 100bps above the base case - For the 10% revenue outperformance case, assume capex in this scenario scales faster than revenue and as a % of revenue increases by 100bps above the base case In the final results, round all % values to 1 decimal point. Write back to me with your findings here as a short message.

Planet Fitness is considering the acquisition of 100% stake in The Gym Group and taking it private in order to expand its presence within the UK. Using GYM H1 2025 and GYM annual 2024 docs, consider the following assumptions: 1) Assume the full year 2025 revenue equal to LTM revenue June 2025 2) Assume the full year 2025 Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent equal to LTM Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent June 2025. 3) Assume the annual revenue growth is 3% for all years going forward beginning January 1, 2026 4) Assume the annual margin expansion going forward beginning January 1, 2026 is 50 bps 5) Assume that GBP/USD exchange rate is equal to 1.31 as of December 31, 2025 and GBP will appreciate 2% every year beginning January 1, 2026 6) Assume that Depreciation and Amortization is 5% of the revenue and the existing debt at the end of June 30, 2025 is refinanced at a rate of 3.00% for an amortization term of 5 years based on equal payments. For interest expense computation, consider it based on the opening balance. 7) Assume that there is no other operating income or expenses and effective tax rate is 10%. 8) Assume there's no capex or change in NWC during the projection period. 9) Assume the 100% acquisition in The Gym Group is announced at 11x EV/ 2025 Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent on December 31, 2025. 10) Assume the net debt as of June 30, 2025. 11) Assume that The Gym Group provides dividends to the parent on December 30 every year to a maximum of its Profit after tax. 12) Assume that the exit multiple at the end of December 31, 2030 is 12x EV / 2025 Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent. 13) Assume that there is no interest income on cash during the projection period and no cash balance at the end of December 31, 2030. Return for me a message with the Equity Value for 100% stake purchase of The Gym Group. Also give me the 2026 to 2030 dividends, and the IRR for Planet Fitness (post FX conversion). In your answer, round the percentages and the millions to two decimal places.

Calculate operating cost before D&A as a percentage of sales ("operating cost margin") for each of GYM, Life Time, Planet Fitness, and Xponential fitness for each year from FY2021 to FY2024 before D&A, then calculate the average of those results. Print your answers as a reply to me here. Give them as percentages, rounded to two decimal places.

Using the LBO model, update the analysis to reflect a go-forward plan which emphasizes an increased investment on franchisee-owned stores. Output the implied Sponsor Equity Value and IRR for Year 5. Round percentages to 1 decimal point and round monetary values to the nearest whole million USD. Bear in mind: -Increase the "New stores opened" assumption for Franchisee-owned stores each quarter from 1QE 2026E through 4QE 2030E by 5.0% vs. the corresponding quarter in the base case -Adjust the "Same Store Sales" assumption for Franchisee-owned stores each quarter from 1QE 2026E through 4QE 2027E to 7.0%, and then from 1QE 2028E to 4QE 2030E, hold Same Store Sales assumption constant at 5.5% -Increase "Exit Multiple" assumption from 18.0x to 19.5x to account for the increased overall EBITDA margin of the business though franchise growth

Calculate the sponsor equity value and IRR for FY2030, then report the sponsor equity value in US dollars, rounded to the nearest million. Report the IRR to one decimal place. Reference the LBO model where needed. Note: the LBO model has an error. Mandatory Debt Repayments in the Levered Free Cash Flow build should be set to $0 to correct the error. Use the following specifications: - Decrease “Secured term loan - USD tranche” yield from 7.5% to 5.0%. - Increase annual mandatory amortization of the “Secured term loan – USD tranche” to 7.5% of the opening principal balance of $3,432mm. - Hold revenue growth constant at 13.0% per year from FY2026 to FY2030; model drivers should reflect the updated revenue growth (for avoidance of doubt, OpEx remains unchanged vs the base case in $ terms). - Only 10.0% of the cash available for total debt service in each year is allocated to the optional repayment of the secured term loan. Give me the answers here in the console.

Using the LBO analysis, conduct a Purchase Price Allocation to show the amount of pro-forma goodwill created from this transaction. Also show the allocable purchase premium. Round all monetary values to the nearest million. Write back the results as a message to me in here. # Assumptions - Balance sheet figures sourced from the "Balance Sheet" tab, using FY25E data (as of Q425) - Intangible Assets Write Up: Intangible asset allocation %: 10.0%. Useful life assumption: 15 years - PP&E Write Up: PP&E write up %: 10.0%. Useful life assumption: 8 years - Tax rate of 25%

Conduct a 5-year IRR sensitivity analysis using Planet Fitness' financial model. Model the impact if, starting Q1 2026, Planet Fitness opens 10 additional Franchisee-owned stores each quarter, compared to the same quarter in the prior year, and continues this trend each quarter until Q4 2030. 1. Using the "Copy of LBO" tab, calculate the 5-year IRR when share price premiums are 10%, 15% and exit multiples are 16x, 17x, 18x. 2. Round all calculated results to one decimal place. REQUEST: Put in a sensitivity table to a new Sheet with these values.

Output the year 5 Equity Value to Sponsors and IRR (with a 5 year exit). From the existing LBO model, update values to both a 20% equity rollover from existing shareholders and a 10% management option pool. Write the information straight here. Assumptions: -Existing shareholders have agreed to roll 20% of their exit proceeds into the deal as a source of funds (i.e., note that existing shareholders will have a 20% pro forma equity stake) -Impact of net option dilution calculation as follows: *Options only trigger if exit equity is greater than entry equity *If options trigger, gross proceeds to management is total exit equity multiplied by the percentage of management's option pool *Netted against management's cost to exercise, calculated as the value of entry equity multiplied by percentage of management's option pool Round monetary values to nearest whole number. Round all other values to 1 decimal point.

Use Planet Fitness' latest financial model, and conduct an ability to pay analysis around Advent's target IRR of 25%. Create a new xlsx sheet, then round all calculated values to two decimal places for: the implied premium paid when target IRRs are 20.0%, 22.5%, 25.0%. Exit multiples are 18x and 20x.

Please calculate the DCF value per share applying the midyear convention. Keep all other assumptions the same in the existing model. Provide your answer right here, rounded to the nearest cent

Using the DCF calculate the implied levered FCF yield for CNS in 2030E for (1) the perpetuity growth method and (2) the exit multiple method. Assume a 10% WACC, 2% terminal growth rate, and an 11x exit multiple. Provide values to one decimal place. Write out your reply to me here.

Provide the mean implied equity value for CNS from the Comparables and Precedents using 2025E EBITDA, as well as the implied equity value from the DCF and LBO using the base DCF and assumed offer price. Provide the results of all four methods and the mean in $ million, to one decimal place. Give it as a message right here.

Your task is to evaluate the impact of financing constraints on Project Vanguard's take-private economics and develop a revised LBO case reflecting a capped leverage scenario using the LBO model. • Term Loan B (TLB): cap maximum proceeds at $1,250 MM • Adjust Sponsor Equity so that Total Sources = Total Uses, maintaining a constant enterprise value (EV) at entry (excluding fees and cash to balance sheet). • Exit Multiple: assume 2030E Exit Multiple of 18.5x In the existing LBO model, I want you to compute the Implied Adj. EBITDA Entry Multiple (2024A). Label this calculation as: “Implied Adj. EBITDA Entry Multiple (2024A)”. Also, create a 2x2 sensitivity tables for Sponsor IRR (%). Set rows as: Premium to Current (15.0%, 25.0%) and columns as: Exit Multiple (17.5x, 18.5x). Populate the tables with recalculated IRR values based on the revised capital structure reflecting the Term Loan B cap. Round the final results to one decimal place and keep the same formatting as the original sensitivity table.

Assume that CNS has been taken private as of the start of FY25E. The new PE owners have decided to reduce employee compensation by 50% of the value of stock-based compensation in the previous LBO forecast (when CNS was a public company). Based on this, calculate the revised DCF per share valuation of CNS. Keep all assumptions the same per the DCF base case. Provide your response right here, rounded to the nearest cent.

Using the precedents and DCF analysis calculate an implied share price for CNS to 2 decimal places. Exclude transactions where the target had <$90 B in AUM. Using the forward EBITDA from the DCF, assume a 10% increase in total expenses and only a 5% increase in Depreciation and amortization. Edit the existing sheet to provide the share price build (EV / EBITDA, 2025E EBITDA, Implied EV, Net Debt, Implied Market Cap, FDSO and share price), starting in the 'Precedents' tab. Round all values to 2 decimal places.

Can we see what the DCF per share value is if the terminal value is based on EV / AUM of the peer set? Let's exclude AMG and JHG for purposes of this exercise. Assume that AUM grows linearly with management fees, round to the nearest cent. Print your answer back here.

What is the EV and implied share price of CNS in the DCF model using both Gordon growth model and exit multiple approach if each business segment grows as outlined below over the projection period of 2025 to 2030? Segment 1 - Investment advisory and administration fees grows at 7.0% revenue growth per annum Segment 2 - Distribution and service fees grows at 6.0% revenue growth per annum Segment 3 - Other grows at 5.0% revenue growth per annum Output the following to me with a short message in reply: 1. EV using the Gordon growth method 2. Implied share price using the Gordon growth method 3. EV using the exit multiple approach 4. Implied share price using the exit multiple approach Report share price in $ and to 2 decimal places, report EV in whole number and in millions. For operating expenses and capex use the Operating Assumptions (provided as a % of total revenue) laid out in the “LBO Model-hardcoded” tab.

Using a discounted cash flow (DCF) model, what is the implied share price under the following assumptions: - Revenue growth is 2.0 percentage points lower than the current growth rates in each year from 2025 to 2030. - Employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of revenue are 2.0 percentage points higher than the current figures in each year from 2025 to 2030. - Mid-year convention is used. I want you to (1) Tell me the implied share price using the Gordon Growth Method. Then, (2) tell me the implied share price using the Exit Multiple Approach. Reply to me with a message outlining these values in USD, rounded to two decimal places.

Management believes that the appropriate valuation of the DCF terminal value is the EV / mgmt. fees portfolio multiple of the asset managers peer set per the comparables analysis excluding JHG and AMG. Calculate CNS's implied terminal growth rate using that approach. Keep all other assumptions the same per the DCF base case. Provide your findings as a message here, rounding percentage values to 2 decimal places.

Output two values for me: 1. The implied share price using the Gordon growth method 2. The implied share price using the exit multiple approach You will need to update the DCF model with the following changes to get the right answer: 1. Change depreciation and amortization as a percentage of total revenue from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as 2024 2. Change Total current assets as a percentage of total revenue from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as 2024 3. Change Total current liabilities as a percentage of total revenue from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as 2024 4. Change revenue growth from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as revenue growth between 2023 and 2024 5. Change distribution and service fee to 15% of the total revenue from 2025 to 2030 Respond with a short message here. Report share price in $ and round it to 2 decimal places

You have the MFC model. Calculate the implied sponsor equity at entry in FY2032 and report it in Canadian dollars (C$), rounded to the nearest million. Respond by printing out back to me. Reference the "LBO (Option C)" tab for interim calculations. Develop one scenario with the following specifications: Increase the Term Loan B leverage to 4.5x LTM EBITDA and the yield to 8.50%. Increase the senior notes leverage to 2.5x LTM EBITDA and the yield to 11.00%. Hold revenue growth constant at 8.0% per year from 2026 to 2032. Use target IRR of 25.0% and exit multiple of 12.0x.

Please use assumptions below for a more aggressive financial forecast, which is termed the "SuperUpside" case: - The drivers of the SuperUpside case adds to the "Upside" case the difference between the "Base" and the "Upside" cases in the MFC model. - For example, if the "Base" case for FY23 revenue growth is 3% and the "Upside" case is 5%, then the "SuperUpside" case is 7% (5% Upside + 2% difference between Base and Upside). - As a further example, if the "Base" case COGS % sales is 20% and the "Upside" case COGS % sales is 19%, then the "SuperUpside" case is 18% (19% Upside - 1% difference) Please calculate the FY29 change in cash assuming that management has decided on a debt-only refinancing (Option A / Case 1 in the model "toggle"). Please reply back to me with the answer, rounded to the millions of dollars.

The Private Equity Sponsor wants to extract cash via a "Dividend Recapitalization" at the end of 2027. Using the MFC model, you must size the Maximum Special Dividend the company can pay while remaining compliant with a strict Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) covenant. Report the 2027 CFADS, Max Total Debt, and the Net Special Dividend ($000s). Reply back here with the numbers. Scenarios: 1. Timing: The dividend recap transaction closes at the end of Fiscal Year 2027. Use 2027 forecast data. 2. Covenant Constraint: - Pro Forma DSCR, defined as CFADS / debt service, must be at least 1.40x. - Cash Taxes (Override): Calculate normalized cash taxes as 25.0% for the purpose of dividend recap 3. New Debt Structure: - The company will refinance all existing debt into a new Senior Facility. - Interest Rate: 6.5% (Fixed). - Mandatory Amortization: 1.0% of Principal per year. - Total Service Constant: 7.5% (Interest + Amort). 4. Dividend Recap Transaction Fees: 2.0% of the Incremental Debt Raised (New Total Debt - Old Existing Debt). Instructions: 1. Calculate 2027 CFADS using the override tax assumption. 2. Solve for the Maximum Total Debt Capacity allowed by the 1.40x DSCR constraint. 3. Calculate the Incremental Debt (Max Total Debt - Existing 2027 Year-End Debt). 4. Deduct dividend recap transaction fees to find the Net Special Dividend.

Calculate an updated implied sponsor equity at entry with FY2032 exit. Use the MFC LBO model and the assumptions below: - Reduce the TL-B leverage multiple from 3.0x LTM EBITDA while lowering the yield 6.50%. - Increase the senior notes leverage multiple from 2.0x to 3.5x LTM EBITDA and Increase the yield from 9.50% to 11.0%, apply the rate to the beginning balance each year, and assume full PIK treatment, with annual interest accruing and being added to the ending principal balance and paid in FY2032 (no interim cash interest payments). - Maintain revenue growth at 6.0% per annum from FY2026 through FY2032 and use target IRR of 25%. Leave all other assumptions unchanged. Report in Canadian dollars (C$), rounded to the nearest million. State your answer to me right here.

Muskrat Falls Corp (MFC) has decided on a debt-only refinancing at market rates, i.e. Option A (Case 1 of the model "toggle") in the MFC model. MFC is valued at 12x EV / NTM EBITDA. Please calculate the company's equity value at end FY30, assuming the following: * Due to unfavorable macro conditions, MFC is only able to re-finance its debt at an additional 75bps spread to the base case * MFC managed to receive regulatory relief that permits it to reduce restricted cash by $100M each year, starting in Jan FY27, with funds returned to shareholders as special dividends Please provide your response in millions of dollars. Print the information I need back here.

Use the MFC model to return Implied Total Enterprise Value (in Canadian dollars, C$, rounded to the nearest million) under the following assumptions. 1. Refinancing + EPP - Decrease the Refinancing + EPP spread from 3.5% to 2.5%. - Preferred equity issuance size increased to C$2,000,000, along with the preferred dividend rate decreased to 7.5%. - Hold revenue growth constant at 7.0% per year from FY2026 to FY2032. 2. Discounted cash flow analysis scenario with the following specifications: - Begin with the change in cash for each year from FY2026 through FY2032, and add back both preferred dividends and tax-affected interest expense in order to derive unlevered free cash flow for each period to be discounted to net present value. - Apply a WACC of 12.0% - For each year, calculate the net present value of the unlevered free cash flow using 2025 as year 0.. - Utilize an exit EBITDA multiple of 15.0x. Give me the information in your reply here.

You have the MFC model. Calculate the Total Debt / EBITDA in FY2030 and report it in multiple, rounded to one decimal place. Print your answer to me here. Reference the "Refinancing (Option A +B)” tab for interim calculations under Option A, Case 1 of the model “toggle.” Develop one scenario with the following specifications: Increase the Refinancing spread from 4.0% to 6.0%. Hold revenue growth constant at 6.0% per year from 2026 to 2030.

Assume that Muskrat Falls Corp's (MFC) owners have decided on an LBO process. Blackstone has decided to bid for the business via its infrastructure fund. Please calculate Blackstone's "ability to pay", i.e. the entry transaction EV for MFC, given the following assumptions using the MFC model: * FY2032 exit at 12x LTM EV/EBITDA * 12% IRR threshold (given the stability of infrastructure assets) * In addition to the base case LBO financing package, Blackstone will additionally source a $2bn preferred with a 9% PIK coupon from a third-party investor Reply back to me here with your findings.

Muskrat Falls Corp's (MFC) owners have decided to pursue option A (Case 1), i.e. the debt refinancing only option, and hold MFC as an investment and selling at the end of FY35. Assume the following: * Financial model remains the same from FY25 to FY32, per MFC model, and from FY32 to FY35 all model drivers are extended * Interim cash flows are received at the end of each year; free cash flow is first used to pay down debt then paid out as a dividend to the owners * Sale of MFC at the end of FY35 for 13.5x LTM EBITDA * Owner's hurdle rate is 15% Calculate the present value of MFC to its owners (i.e. as of end FY25). Provide a response with the number rounded to the nearest millions of dollars.

Use the MFC model we made. MFC has chosen to proceed with a debt-only refinancing at market rates (Option A / Case 1). At the start of each year, it decides to issue new debt up to a maximum of 4.0x gross leverage in total debt capacity (LTM EBITDA), with the proceeds used to fund special dividends to its shareholders. Please calculate the amount of special dividends received until the end of the projection period in FY32. Provide your response back to me here, rounded to the millions of dollars.

Use the MFC model to reply to me with the updated Retained Cash and ending Long-term debt in FY2030 under the following assumptions. Report in Canadian dollars (C$), rounded to the nearest million. 1. Refinancing + EPP - Decreased the Refinancing + EPP spread to 2.5%. - Preferred equity issuance size increased to C$2,000,000. - The preferred dividend rate decreased to 7.5%. 2. To determine the ending balance for long-term debt from FY2026 through FY2032, the following two components are subtracted annually from the beginning balance: - Mandatory Repayment (Amortization): Calculated as 2.5% of the beginning balance of long-term debt for each year. - Discretionary Repayment (Excess Cash Sweep): Determined as 80.0% of the annual change in cash before the payment of mandatory debt repayments. 3. Retained cash represents cash preserved after satisfying all scheduled debt repayments and discretionary sweeps, and will remain on the balance sheet rather than being allocated for further debt reduction. Assumes no cash interest income is earned on retained cash from FY 2026 through FY 2032. 4. 50% of retained cash generated in FY 2027 will be used to fund a one-time special dividend distribution in FY 2028. This amount will be taken out of operational cash flows, reducing funds available for debt repayment, rather than retained cash.

Using Option B in the MFC model, the refinancing in conjunction with a equity private placement (preferred stock), update to upsize the preferred tranche to $1.5bn and for interest to be payment-in-kind (PIK) rather than in cash. In addition, the preferred will now be redeemed at the end of 2030. When the preferred matures, MFC will aim to execute a refinancing for up to 4.5x of gross leverage (gross debt / LTM EBITDA). Use of proceeds from this re-financing will be applied to (a) pay off the preferred; and then (b) fund a shareholder special dividend Calculate the maximum size of the shareholder special dividend in $s to the nearest million. Print the answer here.

Please calculate the total value of a MFC privatization by the provincial government at a bid value of 11x LTM EBITDA, which composes of both the (a) upfront proceeds from the sale and (b) value of the tax stream, assuming the following using the MFC model: * The province receives 1/3 share of the corporate tax (the other 2/3 going to the federal government) * Given its "super-priority", the discount rate on the tax stream is 4% * The terminal growth rate of the tax stream is expected to be the 2032 revenue growth rate of MFC Please provide your response to me here, in millions of dollars that are rounded to the nearest million.

Calculate a normalized market capitalization for AES using data from the comps file and the following approach: - Calculate the volume‑weighted average price (VWAP) for AES Corporation over the 250 trading days to 20 Nov 2025, in two steps: Step 1: For each trading day, compute the daily dollar value by multiplying the average of that day’s high, low, and close prices by the total volume traded that day, then sum these daily dollar values over the full 250‑day period. Step 2: Divide this 250‑day cumulative dollar value by the cumulative trading volume over the same 250‑day period to arrive at the 250‑day VWAP. - Determine the percentage share price increase (premium) by comparing the 20 Nov share price to the 250‑day VWAP. - Normalize AES Corporation’s market capitalization by removing the premium of the most recent share price over the 250‑day VWAP, so that the resulting normalized market capitalization reflects the VWAP rather than the latest trading price. Return only the final result to me right here as a short message. Give it in billions of Canadian dollars (C$) and rounded to one decimal place.

Using KSchool's DCF, update the 2026 revenue growth rate so that the 2024-2028 Revenue CAGR is equal to INST's 2019-2023 selling and marketing expense CAGR. Then make it a 6-year projection period and keep assumptions for the 6th year the same from 2028. Add 25bps to Terminal Growth Rate. Accounting for these changes, return the implied share price to me right in here. Round the numbers to two decimal places.

Use the LBO model with the following indicative debt package to calculate these values --> then, return them back to me here 1/ Equity contribution 2/ Central case IRR 3/ Central case MOIC 4/ Exit net debt 5/ Maximum amount of revolver drawn Term Loan A: Amount: $1.8bn Term: 7 years, straight line amortising Rate: 7-year US Treasury (market rate) + 225bps Arrangement Fee: 0.75% Term Loan B: Amount: $600m Term: 10 years, bullet repayment Rate: 10-year US Treasury (market rate) + 275bps Arrangement Fee: 0.75% Revolver: Amount: $600m Rate: 5.5% Round percentages and multiples to two decimal places, and dollar amounts in millions, rounded to the nearest whole number. Assume market rates from 28-Nov-2025 (U.S. Treasury Daily CMT).

Calculate the 2027P equity value implied by the LBO output. Replace the 2027P exit EBITDA multiple with the average calculated FY2023 EV/EBITDA multiple for CHGG and LOPE. Present the result to me here, rounded to the nearest $ million

Can you help me calculate a new implied share price, rounded to two decimal places? Return your answer to me here Update the DCF so that its 2024-2028 R&D CAGR is equal to PWSC's 2019-2023 R&D CAGR. Update revenue growth rate for 2027 to achieve this. Then adjust operating expenses (excluding R&D) in year 2028 so that its 2024-2028 CAGR is one half PWSC's 2019-2023 G&A CAGR. Lastly, update the DCF with the average 10-year treasury rate for 12/2/2025 - 12/19/2025.

Referencing the KSchool DCF, how much does the company need to increase or decrease 2023's earnings to have it's P/E ratio in 2023 equal to the sector average for communication services as of 1/1/2026. Assume P/E is calculated using its implied share price from the DCF model. Return a short reply with the dollar amount in millions, rounded to nearest integer.

Calculate the 2028P equity value implied by the LBO output, assuming an exit multiple of 32.0x. Present your result to me as a message in here, rounded to the nearest $ million. Use the following conditions: - Set maximum leverage on the Term Loan A, measured against 2023A EBITDA, at 10.0x, with any remaining funding requirement to be satisfied through an increased equity contribution. - For revenue growth, calculate the average 2024 year‑over‑year revenue growth rate of the following three companies—Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL), Coursera, Inc. (NYSE: COUR), and Grand Canyon Education, Inc (NASDAQ: LOPE). Apply this single average 2024 growth rate to the company’s revenue in 2024, and assume this constant revenue growth rate from 2025P - 2028P. - All other assumptions remain unchanged.

Using the DCF model, update the equity risk premium to be the risk-free rate plus 150 basis points and the cost of debt to be the risk-free rate plus 300 basis points Output the following rounded to two decimal places: - Implied DCF share price with a terminal growth rate of 1.25% and 5-year risk free rate of 12/12/2025 - Implied DCF share price with a terminal growth rate of 1.25% and 7-year risk free rate of 12/12/2025 - Implied DCF share price with a terminal growth rate of 1.75% and 5-year risk free rate of 12/12/2025 - Implied DCF share price with a terminal growth rate of 1.75% and 7-year risk free rate of 12/12/2025

I want to know the implied DCF share price with a revised scenario, rounded to two decimal points. Do your calculate by updating the cost of debt in the DCF model to be the average between the 1 year and the 5 year treasury rates as of 12/22/2025 plus 100 basis points. Set revenue growth rate to 12% for the entirety of the projection period and update the equity beta to 1.3. Don't edit any files, just print your answer back here.

Calculate the updated PV of FCF. Output it here. Round it to the nearest whole number, with zero decimals. Print your answer as a reply back here. Account for: 1. Identify the competitor in the comparable analysis file with the lowest EV/Revenue multiple. 2. Replace KSchool's gross margin rate for the projection periods with the FY 2024 gross margin of the competitor identified above and add +10%. 3. Replace KSchool's Operating expenses rate for the projection periods as the average of SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue of the competitor from FY 2021 to FY 2024. 4. Update the risk-free rate to be the 20 year treasury yield from Oct 20, 2025.

The current standalone DCF valuation does not include synergies. In the valuation model, re-run the analysis to include synergies, integration, and transaction costs. In the accretion dilution model project, the "Synergies" and "ProForma_Combined" tabs contain these assumptions. 1. Update the vauation model "Project_Rheingold_Valuation_Model(final)" 2. Implement One-Time Integration Costs (After-Tax), Transaction Costs (After-Tax), and EBITDA Synergy (pre-tax) into the DCF analysis, maintaining all existing DCF assumptions. 3. Report back for me: "Sum of PV of FCF (2026-2030)", "PV of Terminal Value", "Enterprise Value", "Implied EV/EBITDA(2025E)", "Implied EV/Revenue(2025E)". 4. Round all final monetary values (millions) and multiples to one decimal place.

Calculate the incremental Enterprise Value the Gerresheimer acquisition will add to the Aptar Group. Only reference the board presentation. Assume multiples for The Aptar Group remain constant and reference the acquisition multiple of 4.5x for Gerresheimer to arrive at the acquisition price. Use 2025E EBITDA. Do not incorporate synergies. Express your answer as a message right here. Give numbers in USD million, rounded to one decimal point.

Create a new Spreadsheet for me. Please compute a new Adjusted EBITDA value for the following companies: West Pharmaceutical, Stevanato Group, Schlott Pharma, Berry Global, Aptar Group using the board presentation, by taking the peer group median EBITDA margin and the corresponding revenue values. Multiply the Adjusted EBITDA values by the peer group median EBITDA multiple to derive a new Enterprise Value for each company. Report back the values. Display all margins and multiples to one decimal place and revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, and EVs to the nearest whole number, expressed in $mm.

Run a new DCF scenario. Make the following changes to the metrics in the projection period for Solventum: - Update Sales of Product, Sales of Software, and Rentals from 2025 to 2029 to be a 2-year moving average growth rate. - Cost of Product (%of Total COGS), and Cost of software and rentals (% of Total COGS) from 2025 to 2029, to be a 2-year moving average of previous years. - SG&A as % of sales and R&D as % of sales from 2025 to 2029 to be a 2-year moving average of previous years. Output the following - EV of Solventum from the DCF model - Implied DCF share price of Solventum from the DCF model Report share price in $ and round to 2 decimal places, and report EV in whole numbers and in millions ($m). Print your answer here.

Using the accretion dilution model, produce the deliverables outlined below. Round all the figures to whole numbers, present monetary amounts in $ mm and display percentages to two decimals places. The client wants to make the following adjustments to the DCF model. - Revise the COGS assumptions for both Cost of Product & Cost of software and rentals as a % of Revenue, and make it a three-year moving average for 2025E and future years. For years 2026E, 2027E, 2028E and 2029E, add 25 basis points to each year's three-year moving average. Update the gross profit based on these assumptions - Revise the Selling, general and administrative expenses by making it a three-year moving average for 2025E and future years - Revise the Research and development expenses to 10% of sales for years 2026E through 2029E if prior years discounted cashflows exceed $1,000 mm and apply a three-year moving average for years where discounted cashflows are below $1,000 mm - Revise the revenue growth assumptions by changing 2025E growth to -0.5% for both Sales of Product & Sales of Software and Rentals. For years 2026E through 2029E, use a three year moving average for each year and subtract 50 basis points from that calculated growth rate each year - Use a WACC calculated by using only Zimmer Biomet and Smith & Nephew in WACC Calculation as comparables - Use a terminal growth rate of 1.5% Return a short message explaining to me: 1. Sum of Discounted Value of cashflows for 2025E through 2029E excluding the terminal value. 2. Terminal Value. 3. Discounted Terminal Value. 4. Enterprise Value 5. Discounted Terminal Value as a percentage of Enterprise Value.

Assume that no transaction happens with SOLV. Now, calculate the impact of a large investment in AI for MMM shareholders as an alternative capital allocation strategy using the accretion dilution model. Print me back the answer right here, showing: Total new debt from MMM's AI related initiatives Total debt Total after tax Interest Expense PF Net Income Pro Forma EPS EPS accretion/dilution Ending cash Using the following assumptions calculate the impact to EPS for MMM shareholders assuming no transaction with SOLV: - Required investment in technology of $5 billion - half of the investment to be financed from cash in hand and the rest with new debt at a 8.5% cost - Reduction in work force resulting cost savings pre tax of $1 billion - Severance cost associated with the reduction in work force of $4 billion to be financed with $500 million of cash in hand and the rest with new debt at a 12% cost. Assume 50% of the total severance costs will be paid upfront and the remainder over a 4 year period in equal amounts with the first payment beginning in year 1. These costs should be accounted as an expense and not capitalized. Any remaining cash from the debt not used upfront goes to the balance sheet - Increase in power costs associated with the investment in AI of $600 million per year - Apply an incremental 10% tax on power cost for every $100 million of power spend as a pollution compensation policy. Assume the 10% tax doubles for every $100 million of incremental spend. Assume this tax is embedded in the cost. - Assume to bolster balance sheet, MMM also issues equity for equivalent of $2 billion dollars at a issuing price of $250 dollars per share Remember in your answer: EPS should have two decimals. Percentages should have two decimals. All other values given as $ in millions, no decimals.

We want to do some historical analysis. Using stock prices for the 250 trading days up to Nov 19, 2025, calculate the beta for SOLVM to the XLV ETF. Then over the same time period, calculate the beta for MMM to the XLI ETF. Using the CAPM, calculate the cost of equity (Ke) for each company. Assume an expected market return of 12% and a risk-free rate of 3.95%. Print the answers back here. Use the accretion dilution model for stock prices for SOLV and MMM. Use the XLV Healthcare ETF and XLI Industrials ETF files for stock prices for the XLV and XLI ETFs. Use adjusted close prices. Present betas as a decimal, rounded to two decimal places. Present the cost of equity as a percentage, rounded to 1 decimal place.

In the Accretion / Dilution Model, use the capital structure and shares outstanding assumptions for Solventum (SOLV) to calculate levered free cash flow and price per share. Specifically, use the following incremental assumptions: - Revenue Growth Rate: 2.0% beginning in FY25E through the end of the forecast period FY29E - SOLV Interest Rate: 5.50% to forecast interest expense - Other expense (income), net: Remains $0.00 in each period - Cost of Equity: Use the average of cost of equity of the three comps used in the WACC calculation (Exclude Zimmer Biomet) - Capex: 110.0% of D&A beginning in FY25E through the end of the forecast period FY29E With all that, calculate the implied price per share to 2 decimal places. Reply straight back to me here.

Estimate impact to EPS of MMM divesting 1/3, 2/3 or 100% of its holdings in SOLV. Using the accretion dilution model, calculate the EPS impact of selling the different amounts of shares. Assume that MMM has to pay a 20% tax on the proceeds from the divestiture of the first 1/3 of the shares, a 25% tax on the next 1/3 and a 30% tax on the last 1/3 of the shares. Assume that net proceeds from the divestiture are invested in an instruments that pays an 8% interest rate upfront and that interest income is taxed at 35%. Tell me: 1- Percentage of SOLV Divested 2- EPS Accretion / Dilution 3- Pro forma net income Pro forma net income should incorporate the impact of investment of net proceeds from divestiture at 8% and after tax. All figures should be presented with two decimals. Output the final results by making a new Spreadsheet file.

Present all $ output values in million, round all output values to 1 decimal place. Get the following directly from the accretion dilution model: - Enterprise Value (DCF output) - PV of Free Cash Flows (2025–2029) - Terminal Free Cash Flow (2029) - Terminal Growth Rate (g) - WACC Assume that 3M ownership stake = 20% and: 1. Compute 3M’s stake value using the current DCF Enterprise Value. 2. Reduce each of the FCFs for 2025–2029 by 10% and recalculate the PV of those 5 cash flows using the 7.6% WACC. 3. Recalculate the Terminal Value using the reduced 2029 FCF but keeping the same 3% terminal growth rate and 7.6% WACC. 4. Combine the new PV(FCFs) and PV(TV) to estimate a downside Enterprise Value, and compute the implied downside stake value for 3M. 5. Calculate the percentage loss based on the implied stake values Present your findings in a new deck with: - 3M's Current Implied Stake Value - Sum of PV of Revised Discounted FCFs - Recalculated Terminal Value discounted to the Present - 3M's Revised Stake Value - Percentage Loss

Compare the average tenure of Solventum's board members to the average of its peers' board members (excluding Solventum). Give their average tenure. Then, state which is larger and by how many years. Use the data available in: BLCO DEF14A 2025, 5Form DEF 14A for GE Healthcare Technologies INC filed 04:10:202, PEN Form DEF 14A 2025, ZBH DEF14A 2025, and March 21, 2025 - DEF 14A SOLV. Print your answer back here. Follow these assumptions: 1. Solventum's peers and/or competitors are considered to be those companies listed in the comps folder 2. The competitor average is calculated using all director tenures individually, and not by averaging the averages of each company 3. Average tenure should be presented in years, rounded to 2 decimal place 4. If a member of a company's board of directors was a member prior to a spin-off of the company, the tenure starts on the year of the spinoff 5. Nominated board candidates that have not yet served are considered to have 0 years and 0 months of tenure 6. Tenure for each individual board member should be calculated based on filing date of the source doc and to the nearest year and month before subsequent calculations. Assume tenure began at the midpoint of the year/month stated if an exact date is not given.

Using the merger model and 0000066740-25-000089, please calculate: 1. The Number of Shares Repurchased. 2. The Revised Enterprise Value. 3. The Revised EV/EBITDA multiple for 3M. 4. The Revised P/E ratio for 3M. Present all monetary values in million dollars, rounded to nearest million. Round the number of shares, ratios and percentages to two decimal places. Print your reply back here as a short message. Assumptions and guidance for deliverables: - Note that debt to equity ratio for 3M as of end September 2025 can be calculated using 3M Total Equity in the other file. - Assume that 3M Share price dropped by 8% before the buyback and remained flat after that. - Assume that the amount of proceeds from sale of Solventum are used to paydown debt by 3M to bring debt to equity ratio down to 2.60x. - The left over proceeds from sale of Solventum after paying debt is used by 3M to repurchase shares. - Assume that EBITDA can be adjusted to 2025E EBITDA by multiplying it with 1.05 for simplicity. - For the enterprise value working, use the cash in tab "Assumptions S2". - For the Revised P/E ratio, use the TTM net income given in "Assumptions S2" tab.

Calculate the intrinsic value per share of Solventum based on these assumptions. Use the accretion dilution model. - Lower the gross margin % to 52% for the forecast period 2026E through 2029E. - Change Research & Development expenses as % of Sales to 15% wherein the discounted cashflow is higher than $1,100 mm in the preceding year, and to 10% wherein the discounted cashflow is lower than $1,100 mm in the preceding year for the years 2026E through 2029E. - Remove the comparable Koninklijke Philips from the WACC calculation. - Change the terminal growth rate to 2.0%. - Convert fixed CAPEX to a % of sales, and project using the last 3-year moving average to calculate it for the years 2025E through 2029E. - Update the discounting with 1/12 for 2025E, given that we are at the start of Dec 2025. Adjust the future years discounting convention accordingly. - Pull shares outstanding and Net debt from the "Assumptions S1" tab. Round the final deliverable to two decimal places and express in $ terms. Give me your response right here.

Evaluate the sensitivity of EPS impact to synergies and cost of new debt for the acquisition of SOLV by MMM using the accretion dilution model. Create a new tab in the file, with a table to show EPS impact (accretion or dilution). - Show synergies in increments of $300 million (300m, 600m). - Show cost of new debt in increments of 5ppts (15%, 20%). - Show the price premium per share at different synergy levels. - Assume the price premium per share is 25% for no synergies and increases by 2.5ppt every $100 million in synergies. - Two dec points only.

Under Scenario 1 in the Accretion / Dilution Model, 3M will use 50% debt / 50% equity. $250 million in pre-synergies were identified. Use the following assumptions in the Assumptions S1 tab of the Accretion / Dilution model: - Pre-Tax Synergies: $250mm - Control Premium: 25% - % Stock: 50% - % Debt: 50% - Interest Rate on New Debt: 8% - Fees: 1.5% of Updated Take-Private Enterprise Value - Solventum Share Price: Use the Solventum VWAP for the 75 trading days up to November 19, 2025. To calculate the price for each trading day in VWAP, use the formula (High + Low + Close) / 3 We need the Revised Accretion / Dilution percentage for 3M. Round percentages to 2 decimals points. Write back to me with your response now.

Perform a value-creation analysis based on scenario 1 using the accretion dilution model to assess whether Scenario 1 creates or destroys value for 3M Shareholders. Assumptions: 1. 3M Levered Beta is 1.15 2. Risk free rate is 4.00% 3. Equity risk premium is 5.50% 4. Calculate cost of equity using CAPM: Risk-free rate + Beta*Equity Risk Premium 5. Implied Return = SOLV Net Income/Purchase Price Paid 6. Assume Spread is calculated by Implied Return - WACC 7. For PF WACC, use 3M's existing cost of debt from Scenario 1 and assume the incremental acquisition debt carries a 10.00% interest rate (consistent with Scenario 1 assumptions). Print the output here. Format all final percentages to two decimal places.

Solventum (SOLV) announced a $2.0 billion strategic expansion funded with 70% debt and 30% equity, which caused its share price to increase by 5% relative to the closing price on 11/18/2025. Using the most recent accretion/dilution model rerun scenario 1, assuming the updated SOLV share price. Determine the revised premium 3M would pay under the updated assumptions to keep EPS accretion flat relative to the level from the original 30% premium case. Write back to me with what I requested. In the output, round the percentage to two decimal places.

In the Accretion / Dilution Model, assume stock-based compensation equals 3% of the sum of operating expenses and cost of goods sold, calculated using the model’s existing methodology, and added back to free cash flow in each forecast year. Using the “DCF-Solv” tab, provide an updated estimate of the present value of forecast-period cash flows, excluding the terminal value, under the following assumptions: - Mid-year discounting - Revenue growth of 1.0% from FY2025E through the end of the forecast period Give me figures in USD millions, rounded to two decimal places. Reply right here.

In the Accretion / Dilution Model, there is an error in the calculation of Cost of Product and Cost of Software and Rentals. Calculate the correct revised implied Enterprise Value after the divestiture. Please fix the linking and use the correct formula in the "DCF-Solv Tab" to calculate Product Gross Margin and Software & Rentals Gross Margin to help with the next analysis: In the Accretion / Dilution Model, Solventum's Purification & Filtration Segment (P&F) is being divested at the end of 2025E / beginning of 2026E and should be reflected in financial projections in the "DCF-Solv" tab. The current assumptions in the model for the Purification & Filtration Segment are as follows: - Revenue Growth Rate: 2.0% annually after 2024A - Gross Margins: P&F Gross Margins constant since 2024A - Operating Expenses: P&F Opex % of Revenues constant since 2024A P&F's 2024A results can be in Solventum's 2024 Annual Report. Round financial figures to 2 decimal points, putting them in USD millions. Write a reply to me here with the requested value.

Using the 3Q 2025 3M 10Q and the accretion dilution model, calculate the following deliverables. Present all values in millions ($mm), number of shares in millions (mm), and round to whole numbers. For percentages, two decimal places. Give me the answer straight back here as a message. Base your deliverables on the following assumptions: - For the projections of 2026E cashflow available for buyback, use the extrapolation formulae (12/9 multiplication convention i.e multiply by 12/9) for specific income statement and cashflow items to convert them from nine-months ending September 2025 to full year January to December 2025. For clarity, Income statement and cashflow items on which extrapolation formulae is applied include revenue, operating expenses, depreciation & amortization, Net interest expense, Net income, cashflow from operations and CAPEX (considered as sale of property, plant and equipment). - Assume a growth rate of 5% across specific cashflow statement items calculated using extrapolation formulae for 2025E to calculate the projected cashflow statement items for the year 2026E. Consider CAPEX as sale of property, plant and equipment for the above calculation. Cashflow items on which 5% growth is applied include cashflow from operations and CAPEX. - Use 3M data in "Assumptions S2" tab for required data in the accretion dilution model for scenario 2. Calculate for me: 1. The free cash flow available for buy back in 2026E using the above assumptions by incorporating cashflow from operations and CAPEX in the formulae. 2. The buyback capacity of 3M using the Cashflow available for buy back in 2026E calculated above, minimum cash balance of $100 million, existing cash balance and proceeds from sale. 3. The number of shares that can be repurchased by 3M with this capacity. 4. The percentage reduction in shares outstanding of 3M if the company uses its entire capacity for a buyback.

Using the comps file, refine the BBDC peer set and rebuild the valuation range as of 18 Nov 2025. Use operating data for the 9M to end of 2025Q3 to derive implied prices. 1. Exclude all peers with AUM > 5,000 (values expressed in millions in the file) and exclude TSLX, GBDC, and TRIN from the peer set. 2. For the remaining peers, calculate for P/NAV, P/E, and P/Sales: 25th percentile (P25), Median, and 75th percentile (P75). 3. Derive BBDC valuation cases: Bear = P25, Base = Median, Bull = P75. 4. For each case, compute the implied equity value under each multiple, average the implied values to get the final Bear/Base/Bull equity value, and calculate % upside vs BBDC’s equity value as of 11/18/25. Output a short message with the final Bear/Base/Bull equity values and % upside for each. Give $ rounded to thousands and no decimal places, and percentages and multiples to 2 decimal places.

Use the BBDC valuation model as a template and a prepare a full valuation of SLR INVESTMENT CORP. (SLRC) as of FY 2024. - Use the median of peer trading multiples - Retrieve the SLRC’s required data from the attached SLRC 10K files. - Use the share price as of December 31, 2024 ($16.16) for SLRC's actual equity value. Calculate SLRC’s Implied Equity Value according to the following methods: - P / NAV, P / E, P / Sales, and NAV / Share I want you to compute the Relative Premium / (Discount) of SLRC’s actual equity value. Then, determine the lowest and highest Implied Equity Value from all the valuation methods. Round to the nearest unit for the lowest and highest Implied Equity Value in thousands dollars. Round to 2 decimal places for the Relative Premium / (Discount) results in %. Print the correct information back to me here.

To evaluate where economic value is created in the BBDC & TPVG merger, use the comps and merger models to build a four step value creation bridge. Write your reply to me here. Set the merger model to the 9M TTM 2025 account. Return the incremental change in value (%) between each scenario, the Pro Forma Implied EV after dilution, and total value creation vs standalone % (all to 2 decimal places). Here are the Scenarios: - 1. BBDC Standalone Implied Equity Value based on LTM NAV, LTM NII, and LTM Sales from the valuation model and median P/NAV, P/E, and P/S multiples on all comps from the comps file; - 2. Standalone + Synergies Implied Equity Value using run-rate synergies from the merger model; - 3. Add TPVG NAV Contribution (Pre-Dilution) using TPVG’s standalone NAV from the merger model; - 4. Pro Forma Implied Equity Value (After Dilution) using PF NAV, PF NII, PF Sales, and PF shares from the merger model.

Assume that TVPG raised additional $70 million mezzanine capital ($30 million - equity capital raise from it's current shareholders at a discounted issue price of $6.0 per share and $40 million - debt capital raise at 6% interest rate), and the merger uses 50% cash consideration. Task: Using the 9M TTM 2025 account, recalculate the "Pro Forma Debt" and "Pro Forma Combined Equity Value". Print both values back in your reply. - Assume end of financial year is December 31st, debt issued date was March 31, 2025 - There are zero fees associated with the issues - Round all monetary values to the nearest USD thousand.

If CompliSure experiences the changes outlined in the attachment starting in 2026, what is the expected impact to free cash flow in 2030? Assume Interest Expense remains the same % of EBIT, and Income Tax Expense remains the same % of Pre-Tax Income. Round answer to the nearest thousand. Write your response here as a message.

Based on the attached findings from the top 3 research firms, what is CompliSure’s expected revenue ($M) in 2030 for each scenario? For each scenario, please assume that the overall market size in 2030 remains unchanged and that any market share gained by new entrants is taken proportionally from existing participants based on their current market shares. - Use the latest version of the 5-year forecast to do the analysis. - Round all the final answers to two decimal places; round $ figures to $0.01M. - Use the free cash flow definition applied in the version 5 forecast. Write back your answers to me here.