AI Agents for Comparable Company Analysis

For the Kenvue deal, please send over the below draft figures for pre-deal target multiples for FY24. Utilize potential median deal value Return to me a message with: Deal value/EBITDA, Deal value/EBIT, and Deal value/OpFCF. Round all values to one decimal place.

KVUE's cost of debt is updated to be the risk-free rate plus 100 basis points. Reply to me with KVUE's enterprise value, rounded to the nearest whole number in millions. Use the following situation to calculate the values: - Replace risk-free rate with the 10-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 0.75 - Replace risk-free rate with the 10-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 1.00 - Replace risk-free rate with the 30-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 0.75 - Replace risk-free rate with the 30-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 with beta at 1.00

Update the base-case DCF model of KVUE with U.S. total equity risk premium of 4.33%, the risk free rate with the 5-Year Treasury rate and the KVUE Close share price on 2025-12-15. Let's measure the impact of an increase in tax rate by 4 percentage points (apply to 2025E-2029E and the WACC tax shield) and the decrease in terminal growth rate by 0.25 percentage points. Reply back to me, giving the updated enterprise value, equity value and implied share price, rounded to two decimal places. Express enterprise value and equity value in millions.

Use the DCF model, and make the following changes: - update net sales growth rate in 2029E to be the 2023A actual figure - update long-term growth rate to the 30-year treasury rate as of 1/2/26 minus 100 basis points Reply here with the terminal value. Round it to the nearest whole number in millions.

If you updated the long-term growth rate in the DCF model to be the percentage increase in CPI in 2025 from January 1, 2025 to November 1, 2025, what is the updated implied share price? Also, increase WACC by 60bps and update sales growth to 0.5% every year for the projection period to get your answer. Round it to two decimal places. Write out your answer here.

Please audit the financials of the smallest company in our Refined Comps table by market cap using only the IS, CFS, and BS from sec filings and data tools available to you. Report Adjusted EBITDA and EV in thousands of dollars. Report EV/EBITDA to two decimal points. Calculate the following, and report it back to me with a message here: - Adjusted TTM EBITDA including SBC addback - Adjusted TTM EBITDA excluding SBC addback - EV as of 12/17/25 (use basic weighted-average shares from the latest 10-Q and include all lease liabilities) - EV / adjusted TTM EBITDA (incl SBC) - EV / adjusted TTM EBITDA (excl SBC) Note: Adjusted EBITDA defined as operating income and cash-flow non-cash addbacks, excluding non-cash operating lease cost.

Reply back to me with the following values: - Implied share price. - Enterprise value - % weight of PV of terminal value in the total new EV. To get to the right answer, update the WACC calculation in the DCF model: replace the risk-free rate with the 5-year Treasury rate as of Dec 15, 2025, and use 4.33% as the total equity risk premium for the United States of America. Then, apply the following changes for the forecast years 2025E-2029E: reduce the operating margin by 2 percentage points in each forecast year, set the yearly revenue growth rate to 1.22% in each forecast year, and set CAPEX equal to D&A in each forecast year. Keep everything else the same. When you reply, round the values to two decimal places, express in $millions.

Please calculate the implied premium / discount of the offer price as proposed to the client relative to the following KVUE share prices, using the values up to 12/08/2025: - Closing price on the final day - 52 week high closing price - 52 week low closing price - last 30 trading day VWAP - last 90 trading day VWAP Report percentages to one decimal place. Use unadjusted prices and calculate VWAP based on the daily closing prices. All dates are in MM/DD/YYYY format. Reply back with your answer here.

Reply back to me with the P/E ratio for KVUE, rounded to two decimal points. Use the implied share price in the DCF model and diluted EPS from the annual financials dated 12/23/2025.

From the figures in merger model, please recalculate the stock portion of the offering price (exchange ratio with 5 decimals) using Kimberly-Clark unadjusted closing share price at 31 Oct 25, and then derive the deal implied Kenvue market price per share at 16 Dec 25. What are the dollar spreads of Kenvue's unadjusted closing price (16 Dec 25) relative to this implied price? Print your final answer to me here. Give it to me as dollars and cents.

Calculate the unlevered beta for Haleon (HLN) using Total Debt and Market Capitalization as of the end of FY2024. Assume 0.227 levered beta for HLN and a 21% Tax rate. Using the unlevered beta for HLN computed above, and the debt and equity values in the model, re-leverage the Beta for Kenvue and update the WACC with the new Re-levered Beta. Reply back with a message, giving the following results: - the New WACC - the New Implied Share Price. - the Variance in $ for Share Price (New-Original) Round all outputs to two decimal places.

Update the DCF model to tell us the following: - Assume operating margin % from 2025E-2029E is updated to KVUE's 2019 operating margin plus 50 basis points - Add 25 basis points to terminal growth rate I want to know the implied share price, rounded to two decimal places. Can you tell me here?

Update the DCF model with the following changes - tax rate for the entire projection period (2025E-2029E) and the WACC build is now the implied tax rate from the second quarter of 2023, calculated as income tax expense over revenue, plus 10% - update beta to 1 - assume revenue growth rate in the projection period matches that of 2024A plus 75 basis points. - update terminal growth rate to be equal to the updated monthly revenue growth rate plus 50 basis points - assume final gross debt is increased by 50% and cash balance is now 10% of the absolute increased gross debt number What is equity value in millions rounded to the nearest whole number? Print your answer back to me as a short message.

In a hypothetical acquisition of Kenvue by Kimberly Clark (merger), at what Kimberly Clark share price would accretion for Pro Forma 2025 EPS for the combined company (Kenvue and Kimberly Clark) would be exactly 0.00%? Assume KVUE' share price before applying a premium is the average closing daily price between 1/1/2025 and 06/30/2025. All other assumptions in the base merger model should not be changed. Return your result as a message, give it in dollars with 2 decimal places.

Take the average close price for KVUE for the week of 12/15/2025 to 12/19/2025, apply a 10% premium, and input that figure in the DCF model. Re-calculate both the 1) cost of equity and 2) after-tax cost of debt. Output your answer as a reply here, rounded to two decimal points.

Replace the risk-free rate in the DCF model with the average of the 10 year and 20 year treasury rates as of 12/22/2025, and assume that the cost of debt is this average value plus 150 basis points. Finally, assume that the tax rate is revised up by 50 basis points for the projection period. What is the absolute difference in terminal value in the original calculation and this updated one? Output your result as a reply here, with millions rounded to two decimal places.

Please get the most recent financial year’s EV/FCF multiples (cutoff date 20 Dec 2025) for the public comparables, as per the slides deck, to calculate a cleaned average using the Modified z-score (Median + MAD) approach, with cutoff = 3.0 for outliers (use the standard scaling constant). Then, use this average as exit multiple to calculate terminal value (TV) and baseline EV for Kenvue. What is the implied share price and the difference relative to the initial implied share price as per the DCF model? For final answers, round TV and EV in nearest million, share price and multiples to two decimal places. Carry full precision for intermediate calculations. Print your answer to me here.

Update KVUE's share price to the closing price as of 1/5/26 and 2029E revenue growth rate to that of 2025E. What is discounted free cash flow in 2029E, including terminal value, rounded to the nearest whole number in millions? I want you to reply with your findings in here. To get the right answer, in the WACC build, assume that KVUE is able to refinance its outstanding debt to the following interest rates: - anything 2030 and shorter is the 5 year treasury rate as of 1/5/26 plus 50 basis points - anything 2033 and longer is the 10 year treasury rate as of 1/5/26 plus 50 basis points

Please run an upside DCF scenario for Kenvue assuming slightly better revenue growth and margins changing the following metrics: 1. Revise 2025E revenue growth rate to 2% stepping up by 0.1% per year until 2029E. 2. Increase existing 2025E – 2029E operating margins by 0.1%. 3. Increase D&A as a % of Net Sales by 0.1% in 2025E, and hold the resulting value flat for 2026E–2029E 4. Increase Operating Current Assets as % of Net Sales in 2025E to 2024A + 0.1% stepping up by 0.1% per year until 2029E. 5. Increase Operating Current Liabilities as % of Net Sales in 2025E to 2024A +0.1% stepping up by 0.1% per year until 2029E. Revise the following financial metrics: 6. Update the WACC calculation in the DCF model by using the 10-year Treasury rate as of Dec 12, 2025 7. Reduce the cost of debt by 0.1%. 8. Add 0.1% to the terminal growth rate. Output the following 1. The revised WACC incorporating the above changes. 2. Difference in the sum of unlevered free cash flow from 2025E – 2029E between the model with the above changes and the original model 3. Difference in terminal value between the model with the above changes and the original model 4. Difference in enterprise value between the model with the above changes and the original model 5. % change in enterprise value between the model with the above changes and the original model 6. Revised implied share price in the model with the above changes 7. % change in revised implied share price between the model with the above changes and the original model Round the implied share price and % values to 2 decimal places and all other values to 0 decimal places. Reply to me with your answer here.

Can you please evaluate the outage causes that affect each country the most, in terms of total outage duration? Categorize hazards relating to flooding or storms as the "Weather - Storm" cause and those relating to heat or wildfire as the "Weather - Heat" cause. For France and the Netherlands, state the top weather cause by outage duration, the total events per year in that cause, and the average outage minutes per event in that cause. Note that the Outage ID doesn't reflect individual events; it can be a single event or multiple events combined. Final answers should be rounded to two decimal places. Please report your answers directly to me in here.

Use the churn and WinLoss data, and assume the following: - Competitor Loss Ratio = (Total Contract Value of Lost deals/Total Contract Value of all deals) - If competitor-lost deal value exceeds the retained renewal ARR for that tier: Increase the churned ARR for that tier by 15% - If retained renewal ARR exceeds competitor-lost deal value: Reduce the competitor-lost contract value by 50% - Severity Score = Adjusted Competitor Pressure + (Adjusted Churn Rate x (Adjusted Competitor Lost Value/ Original ARR)) - Competitive Exposure Multiplier = Highest Severity Score ÷ Adjusted Competitor Pressure of that tier - Scenario Sensitivity Factor = Highest Severity Score * (Adjusted Competitor Pressure + Adjusted Churn Rate) Answer the following questions: 1. Which pricing tier has the highest severity score? 2. What is the highest severity score? 3. For the tier identified with the highest severity score, what is the single most frequent competitor appearing in lost deals? (If multiple competitors, return the alphabetically first) 4. For the tier identified with the highest severity score, calculate the Severity Score to Adjusted Churn Rate ratio 5. For the tier identified with the highest severity score, calculate the Competitive Exposure Multiplier? 6. For the tier identified with the highest severity score, calculate the Scenario Sensitivity Factor? Return the responses to the questions right here as a message. Round all final outputs to 2 decimal places.

Using the REIT model re-calculate the Implied REIT Price Per Share using the the 25th Percentile EV/EBITDA and 2025E Revenue Growth percentage of 5%. Return to me right here the price in $ for the same case used in the Executive Summary tab. Round to 2 decimal points.

Calculate the price per share that a strategic buyer would need to offer for Golden Everest to consider an acquisition instead of a REIT conversion. Reply to me here with the minimum required share price. Round all final numbers to two decimal places. I want the 2027 expected share price discounted to 11/21/2025 (18 months) for “C-Corp Low”, “C-Corp Mid”, “C-Corp High”, “REIT Low”, “REIT Mid”, and “REIT High”. Assumptions: 1. It will take 18 months post REIT conversion for the stock to appreciate to fair value, assuming mid-2027 for this process to complete. 2. The discount rate is 4%. 3. Use the low, mid, and high multiples found in the model. 4. Assume the price needed to consider the acquisition is 10% above the valuation for the REIT using the mid multiple. 5. Reference 2025E EV/EBITDA multiples for C-Corp and REIT conversion, and pull 2027E EBITDA values from the model.

Edit the Valuation Summary tab of the REIT model, showing the implied upside/downside percentage for the Mid case of Scenario 1: Current Valuation. - EV/EBITDA multiple: use 50% and 55% of the average multiple for Data Center REITs on the Comparable Companies tab, excluding the highest and lowest companies by market cap. - Current trading price: two columns as 10% and 20% higher than the Strategic Offer share price. Assume revenue growth % is now 9% and EBITDA Margin % is now 41% for the entirety of the projection period and use 2029E EBITDA instead of 2025E EBITDA in the Mid case of Scenario 1: Current Valuation. Round to the nearest two decimal points.

Using the information in the REIT model, create a new sheet: - Re-run the Scenario3: REIT Conversion analysis in sheet "Valuation Summary" using FFO multiples in place of the current EBITDA multiples - Run a low case using Iron Mountain's FFO multiple - Run a High case using Digital Realty's FFO multiple Tell me this info for Low and High cases: - REIT Equity Value ($mm) - Implied REIT Price Per Share - Premium to Current Share price of $42.50 as of 11/21/25 Calculate Golden Everest's 2025E FFO metric by using Digital Realty's implied FFO value (from the information within the "Comparable Companies" tab ) as % of LQA Adjusted EBITDA for the period QE 3/31/2023 within the investor presentation Format all outputs as follows: - Round all dollar figures to 1 decimal place in millions ($m) and express in "$X.X" format - Round all percentages to 1 decimal place - Share price should be to two decimal places

Reply back to me an updated IRR and MOIC. Round final numbers to two decimal places. Use the LBO and comps models to complete the analysis. Follow these assumptions: 1. Remove any comps with Enterprise Value/EBITDA multiples that are negative or greater than 4 times the current median. 2. Calculate the new median EV/EBITDA multiple and use that value +10.00x to replace the exit multiple on the 'LBO' tab of the LBO model 3. Update the senior debt amount on the 'LBO' tab to the minimum EV/Revenue multiple on the comps document

Please assess the impact of reducing the entry premium by 5% and illustrate the potential impact on the deal return. Use the LBO model. 1. Reduce the deal premium by 5%, from 35% to 30%. 2. Reduce the Exit Multiple from 35.0x to 34.0x. 3. Ensure all interest expense calculations are based on the average of the beginning and ending debt balance in the period. Report just the MOIC and IRR %, return it back here. All percentages and multiples must be rounded to two decimal places.

Benchmark the results for Elastic NV Q2'FY26 (ending 10/31/2025) against their industry peers as reported in Public Comparables (for Q2). 1. Calculate the public comparables mean (average) for Market Cap, Enterprise Value, Enterprise Value/Revenue, and Enterprise Value/EBITDA 2. State the percent by which Elastic N.V. Underperformed or Overperformed its peers average across each valuation metric Constraints you MUST follow: 1. Express all multiples to two decimal places, and include 'x' after the second decimal 2. Express Market Cap and Enterprise Value as whole numbers 3. To manage large and extreme values, apply the following for the Public Comparables: 3a. Exclude Market Cap > $1 trillion in calculating the Market Cap average 3b. Exclude Enterprise Value > $1 trillion in calculating the Enterprise Value average 3c. Exclude Negative Multiples for Enterprise Value/Revenue and Enterprise Value/EBITDA 3d. Exclude Multiples > 200.00x for Enterprise Value/EBITDA Write your reply to me here with everything that I asked for.

Assess how much certain business drivers must move to bring IRR below 20%. The stock price has fallen to $87.00. Use the LBO model for the info. 1. Find the critical point (percentages to 2 decimal places) for each of the below business drivers at which rounded IRR would be pushed down to 19.99% from above: a) 'Growth rate scale' (correct the approach for Year 1/2) b) 'Customer acquisition costs' c) 'R&D cost' d) 'Debt costs' e) 'EBITDA multiple' Assumptions and constraints: 1. EBITDA is not to fall below $91 million for any year. If this threshold is passed the new constraint becomes EBITDA for each individual year instead of the IRR. 2. 'Debt costs' should be set to 0% for all other sensitivities. Create a new sheet that shows values for the five major business drivers.

Run a single downside scenario where all modeled sensitivity factors receive a 20% shock, in the direction that would adversely impact IRR. What would the new IRR & Sponsor Equity Value be? Use the LBO model to answer. In the operating assumptions, update the sensitivity shocks of the major business drivers, including: a) -20% 'Growth rate scale', total revenue growth for Elastic for years 1-5 b) 20% 'Customer acquisition costs', total sales and marketing costs for years 1-5 for Elastic c) 20% 'R&D cost', the costs for research and development that Elastic is expected to pay from year 1 to 5 in the future d) 20% 'Debt costs', the interest costs that Elastic would have to pay e) -20% 'EBITDA multiple', the exit multiple that is used in determining the exit valuation Output, in a NEW tab in the existing LBO model, values for “IRR (All factors shocked by 20%)” and “Sponsor Equity Value (All factors shocked by 20%)”. Round all values to two decimal places, and display monetary values in millions ($m). I also want you to give an assessment of whether further analysis is required, based on whether the downside loses money.

Use the LBO model. I want some new analyses: - Decrease the “Premium” from 35.0% to 25.0% on the "LBO" tab - Decrease the “Adj. EBITDA Multiple” from 40.0x to 25.0x on the "LBO" tab - Update revenue growth constant at 15.0% per year from Year 2 through Year 5. Write out to me here: 1. Sponsor Equity Value in Year 5. 2. IRR in Year 5. Round it to the nearest million (e.g., $1,000). Report the IRR as % rounded to one decimal place.

Use Planet Fitness' latest financial model that Advent updated based on their specifications and assess Advent’s “ability to pay” to reach 25% IRR after 5 years if there are net revenue synergies between Planet Fitness and a portfolio company that Advent already holds. Assume exit multiple is 18x and estimated revenue synergies are as follows: $10 million per quarter (Q1-Q4 2026); $50 million per quarter (Q1-Q4 2027 and beyond). Assume no incremental costs associated with the net revenue synergies. Reply to me with a message outlining the implied premium paid to reach 25% IRR, assuming the revenue synergies above.

Calculate the sponsor equity value and IRR for FY2030, then report the sponsor equity value in US dollars as a reply. Round $ to the nearest million and report the IRR % to one decimal place. 1. Reference the "Copy of LBO" tab in the LBO model for interim calculations. 2. Develop one scenario with the following specifications: -- Increase the Cash to $600 from $500 and the Minimum Cash to $100 from $50 -- Decrease the Exit Multiple from 18.0x to 15.0x -- Increase the “Secured term loan - USD tranche” leverage from 6.0x to 7.0x LTM EBITDA -- Remove the annual mandatory amortization of the "Secured term loan – USD tranche" -- Set the interest income rate assumption to 7.5% for each forecast year from FY2026 through FY2030

Conduct a 5-year IRR sensitivity analysis using Planet Fitness' latest financial model that Advent updated based on their specifications (v7). Assess the IRR impact to Advent if the terms of the debt raised changed while keeping 10% offer price premium and 18x exit multiple. Calculate the 5-year IRR when Debt Raised at Close at 6.5x, 7.0x EBITDA and interest rate at 6.5% and 7%. You can use a "Copy of LBO" tab. Round all calculated numbers to one decimal place. Reply back to me here with the information I've asked for.

Use the LBO analysis, update it to assume that Planet Fitness stock option tranches outstanding. I want to see the Year 5 IRR, flexing premium paid and exit multiple. # Assumptions -All options are vested or will vest in the event of a transaction -3 tranches of stock options outstanding: *5.0 million shares at a strike of $105.00/share *4.0 million shares at a strike of $110.00/share *5.0 million shares at a strike of $116.00/share # Output In the LBO analysis file create a new sensitivity table, with the Entry Premium % of 5% and 15%. Also show the Exit Multiple of 16x, 18x and 20x. Round final monetary values to nearest million. Round all other values to 1 decimal point.

Update the LBO analysis tab "Copy of LBO". It needs to include a single potential add on acquisition in FY2027E. Assess the impacts on the 5-year LBO analysis. Use SOFR actual data. Add to that tab, the total debt, total enterprise value, and sponsor IRR. Round $ to millions and others to 1 decimal point. General assumptions: -Target EBITDA at time of acquisition is $41mm -Assume target EBITDA grows at the same CAGR as Planet Fitness standalone EBITDA forecast from 27-30 -Acquisition EBITDA multiple of 10.0x -No synergies -Acquisition funded first by all available cash on hand (less minimum cash), then by a revolver. Revolver assumptions: *The revolver was left undrawn at purchase *Priced at SOFR + 400 (for the purpose of this analysis, pricing will be fixed throughout the forecast at the 30-day Average SOFR as of 11/21 in attached file titled "SOFR (Actual).xlsx") *Maximum revolver capacity of $1,000mm *Unused revolver commitment fee of 0.25% *Revolver paydown is prioritized before cash sweep to any other debt

Planet Fitness is considering the acquisition of 100% stake in The Gym Group and taking it private in order to expand its presence within the UK. Using GYM H1 2025 and GYM annual 2024 docs, consider the following assumptions: 1) Assume the full year 2025 revenue equal to LTM revenue June 2025 2) Assume the full year 2025 Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent equal to LTM Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent June 2025. 3) Assume the annual revenue growth is 3% for all years going forward beginning January 1, 2026 4) Assume the annual margin expansion going forward beginning January 1, 2026 is 50 bps 5) Assume that GBP/USD exchange rate is equal to 1.31 as of December 31, 2025 and GBP will appreciate 2% every year beginning January 1, 2026 6) Assume that Depreciation and Amortization is 5% of the revenue and the existing debt at the end of June 30, 2025 is refinanced at a rate of 3.00% for an amortization term of 5 years based on equal payments. For interest expense computation, consider it based on the opening balance. 7) Assume that there is no other operating income or expenses and effective tax rate is 10%. 8) Assume there's no capex or change in NWC during the projection period. 9) Assume the 100% acquisition in The Gym Group is announced at 11x EV/ 2025 Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent on December 31, 2025. 10) Assume the net debt as of June 30, 2025. 11) Assume that The Gym Group provides dividends to the parent on December 30 every year to a maximum of its Profit after tax. 12) Assume that the exit multiple at the end of December 31, 2030 is 12x EV / 2025 Group Adjusted EBITDA less normalized rent. 13) Assume that there is no interest income on cash during the projection period and no cash balance at the end of December 31, 2030. Return for me a message with the Equity Value for 100% stake purchase of The Gym Group. Also give me the 2026 to 2030 dividends, and the IRR for Planet Fitness (post FX conversion). In your answer, round the percentages and the millions to two decimal places.

Using the LBO model, update the analysis to reflect a go-forward plan which emphasizes an increased investment on franchisee-owned stores. Output the implied Sponsor Equity Value and IRR for Year 5. Round percentages to 1 decimal point and round monetary values to the nearest whole million USD. Bear in mind: -Increase the "New stores opened" assumption for Franchisee-owned stores each quarter from 1QE 2026E through 4QE 2030E by 5.0% vs. the corresponding quarter in the base case -Adjust the "Same Store Sales" assumption for Franchisee-owned stores each quarter from 1QE 2026E through 4QE 2027E to 7.0%, and then from 1QE 2028E to 4QE 2030E, hold Same Store Sales assumption constant at 5.5% -Increase "Exit Multiple" assumption from 18.0x to 19.5x to account for the increased overall EBITDA margin of the business though franchise growth

Using the DCF calculate the implied levered FCF yield for CNS in 2030E for (1) the perpetuity growth method and (2) the exit multiple method. Assume a 10% WACC, 2% terminal growth rate, and an 11x exit multiple. Provide values to one decimal place. Write out your reply to me here.

Your task is to evaluate the impact of financing constraints on Project Vanguard's take-private economics and develop a revised LBO case reflecting a capped leverage scenario using the LBO model. • Term Loan B (TLB): cap maximum proceeds at $1,250 MM • Adjust Sponsor Equity so that Total Sources = Total Uses, maintaining a constant enterprise value (EV) at entry (excluding fees and cash to balance sheet). • Exit Multiple: assume 2030E Exit Multiple of 18.5x In the existing LBO model, I want you to compute the Implied Adj. EBITDA Entry Multiple (2024A). Label this calculation as: “Implied Adj. EBITDA Entry Multiple (2024A)”. Also, create a 2x2 sensitivity tables for Sponsor IRR (%). Set rows as: Premium to Current (15.0%, 25.0%) and columns as: Exit Multiple (17.5x, 18.5x). Populate the tables with recalculated IRR values based on the revised capital structure reflecting the Term Loan B cap. Round the final results to one decimal place and keep the same formatting as the original sensitivity table.

Can we see what the DCF per share value is if the terminal value is based on EV / AUM of the peer set? Let's exclude AMG and JHG for purposes of this exercise. Assume that AUM grows linearly with management fees, round to the nearest cent. Print your answer back here.

What is the EV and implied share price of CNS in the DCF model using both Gordon growth model and exit multiple approach if each business segment grows as outlined below over the projection period of 2025 to 2030? Segment 1 - Investment advisory and administration fees grows at 7.0% revenue growth per annum Segment 2 - Distribution and service fees grows at 6.0% revenue growth per annum Segment 3 - Other grows at 5.0% revenue growth per annum Output the following to me with a short message in reply: 1. EV using the Gordon growth method 2. Implied share price using the Gordon growth method 3. EV using the exit multiple approach 4. Implied share price using the exit multiple approach Report share price in $ and to 2 decimal places, report EV in whole number and in millions. For operating expenses and capex use the Operating Assumptions (provided as a % of total revenue) laid out in the “LBO Model-hardcoded” tab.

Using a discounted cash flow (DCF) model, what is the implied share price under the following assumptions: - Revenue growth is 2.0 percentage points lower than the current growth rates in each year from 2025 to 2030. - Employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of revenue are 2.0 percentage points higher than the current figures in each year from 2025 to 2030. - Mid-year convention is used. I want you to (1) Tell me the implied share price using the Gordon Growth Method. Then, (2) tell me the implied share price using the Exit Multiple Approach. Reply to me with a message outlining these values in USD, rounded to two decimal places.

Management believes that the appropriate valuation of the DCF terminal value is the EV / mgmt. fees portfolio multiple of the asset managers peer set per the comparables analysis excluding JHG and AMG. Calculate CNS's implied terminal growth rate using that approach. Keep all other assumptions the same per the DCF base case. Provide your findings as a message here, rounding percentage values to 2 decimal places.

Output two values for me: 1. The implied share price using the Gordon growth method 2. The implied share price using the exit multiple approach You will need to update the DCF model with the following changes to get the right answer: 1. Change depreciation and amortization as a percentage of total revenue from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as 2024 2. Change Total current assets as a percentage of total revenue from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as 2024 3. Change Total current liabilities as a percentage of total revenue from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as 2024 4. Change revenue growth from 2025 to 2030 to the same rate as revenue growth between 2023 and 2024 5. Change distribution and service fee to 15% of the total revenue from 2025 to 2030 Respond with a short message here. Report share price in $ and round it to 2 decimal places

You have the MFC model. Calculate the implied sponsor equity at entry in FY2032 and report it in Canadian dollars (C$), rounded to the nearest million. Respond by printing out back to me. Reference the "LBO (Option C)" tab for interim calculations. Develop one scenario with the following specifications: Increase the Term Loan B leverage to 4.5x LTM EBITDA and the yield to 8.50%. Increase the senior notes leverage to 2.5x LTM EBITDA and the yield to 11.00%. Hold revenue growth constant at 8.0% per year from 2026 to 2032. Use target IRR of 25.0% and exit multiple of 12.0x.

Calculate an updated implied sponsor equity at entry with FY2032 exit. Use the MFC LBO model and the assumptions below: - Reduce the TL-B leverage multiple from 3.0x LTM EBITDA while lowering the yield 6.50%. - Increase the senior notes leverage multiple from 2.0x to 3.5x LTM EBITDA and Increase the yield from 9.50% to 11.0%, apply the rate to the beginning balance each year, and assume full PIK treatment, with annual interest accruing and being added to the ending principal balance and paid in FY2032 (no interim cash interest payments). - Maintain revenue growth at 6.0% per annum from FY2026 through FY2032 and use target IRR of 25%. Leave all other assumptions unchanged. Report in Canadian dollars (C$), rounded to the nearest million. State your answer to me right here.

Use the MFC model to return Implied Total Enterprise Value (in Canadian dollars, C$, rounded to the nearest million) under the following assumptions. 1. Refinancing + EPP - Decrease the Refinancing + EPP spread from 3.5% to 2.5%. - Preferred equity issuance size increased to C$2,000,000, along with the preferred dividend rate decreased to 7.5%. - Hold revenue growth constant at 7.0% per year from FY2026 to FY2032. 2. Discounted cash flow analysis scenario with the following specifications: - Begin with the change in cash for each year from FY2026 through FY2032, and add back both preferred dividends and tax-affected interest expense in order to derive unlevered free cash flow for each period to be discounted to net present value. - Apply a WACC of 12.0% - For each year, calculate the net present value of the unlevered free cash flow using 2025 as year 0.. - Utilize an exit EBITDA multiple of 15.0x. Give me the information in your reply here.

You have the MFC model. Calculate the Total Debt / EBITDA in FY2030 and report it in multiple, rounded to one decimal place. Print your answer to me here. Reference the "Refinancing (Option A +B)” tab for interim calculations under Option A, Case 1 of the model “toggle.” Develop one scenario with the following specifications: Increase the Refinancing spread from 4.0% to 6.0%. Hold revenue growth constant at 6.0% per year from 2026 to 2030.

Assume that Muskrat Falls Corp's (MFC) owners have decided on an LBO process. Blackstone has decided to bid for the business via its infrastructure fund. Please calculate Blackstone's "ability to pay", i.e. the entry transaction EV for MFC, given the following assumptions using the MFC model: * FY2032 exit at 12x LTM EV/EBITDA * 12% IRR threshold (given the stability of infrastructure assets) * In addition to the base case LBO financing package, Blackstone will additionally source a $2bn preferred with a 9% PIK coupon from a third-party investor Reply back to me here with your findings.

Calculate a normalized market capitalization for AES using data from the comps file and the following approach: - Calculate the volume‑weighted average price (VWAP) for AES Corporation over the 250 trading days to 20 Nov 2025, in two steps: Step 1: For each trading day, compute the daily dollar value by multiplying the average of that day’s high, low, and close prices by the total volume traded that day, then sum these daily dollar values over the full 250‑day period. Step 2: Divide this 250‑day cumulative dollar value by the cumulative trading volume over the same 250‑day period to arrive at the 250‑day VWAP. - Determine the percentage share price increase (premium) by comparing the 20 Nov share price to the 250‑day VWAP. - Normalize AES Corporation’s market capitalization by removing the premium of the most recent share price over the 250‑day VWAP, so that the resulting normalized market capitalization reflects the VWAP rather than the latest trading price. Return only the final result to me right here as a short message. Give it in billions of Canadian dollars (C$) and rounded to one decimal place.

Calculate the 2027P equity value implied by the LBO output. Replace the 2027P exit EBITDA multiple with the average calculated FY2023 EV/EBITDA multiple for CHGG and LOPE. Present the result to me here, rounded to the nearest $ million

Referencing the KSchool DCF, how much does the company need to increase or decrease 2023's earnings to have it's P/E ratio in 2023 equal to the sector average for communication services as of 1/1/2026. Assume P/E is calculated using its implied share price from the DCF model. Return a short reply with the dollar amount in millions, rounded to nearest integer.

Calculate the 2028P equity value implied by the LBO output, assuming an exit multiple of 32.0x. Present your result to me as a message in here, rounded to the nearest $ million. Use the following conditions: - Set maximum leverage on the Term Loan A, measured against 2023A EBITDA, at 10.0x, with any remaining funding requirement to be satisfied through an increased equity contribution. - For revenue growth, calculate the average 2024 year‑over‑year revenue growth rate of the following three companies—Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL), Coursera, Inc. (NYSE: COUR), and Grand Canyon Education, Inc (NASDAQ: LOPE). Apply this single average 2024 growth rate to the company’s revenue in 2024, and assume this constant revenue growth rate from 2025P - 2028P. - All other assumptions remain unchanged.

Calculate the updated PV of FCF. Output it here. Round it to the nearest whole number, with zero decimals. Print your answer as a reply back here. Account for: 1. Identify the competitor in the comparable analysis file with the lowest EV/Revenue multiple. 2. Replace KSchool's gross margin rate for the projection periods with the FY 2024 gross margin of the competitor identified above and add +10%. 3. Replace KSchool's Operating expenses rate for the projection periods as the average of SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue of the competitor from FY 2021 to FY 2024. 4. Update the risk-free rate to be the 20 year treasury yield from Oct 20, 2025.

I'm trying to get a sense of which HarFeast employees are most ready for the digital training rollout. Can you pull the workforce survey data and identify all employees who are above their role type's median readiness score, willing to pilot new tools, willing to spend >2 days in training with dedicated training time, and above the overall median digital comfort score? Once you've identified that "high-priority" group, can you tell me: 1. How many employees qualify and what percentage of the total workforce that represents 2. How many hours these employees spend on manual entry / searching / fixing errors, and what percentage of total manual entry / searching / error fixing hours that represents 3. How many "high-priority" employees there are for each role type Just give me the final answers as a reply in this box, rounded to one decimal place.

Use the valuation model, updating the 'Per Share' and 'Premium' values for the low, mid, and high cases to reflect Blackstone’s acquisition of Company X and the assumptions below. Reply back to me with the per share data in € and the Premium. Round percentages to 1 decimal place. Assumptions to follow - Blackstone acquired Company X in 2020 at an EV of €1000M - Company X revenue was €100M - Company X EBITDA was €50M - Blackstone acquired Company X at a 45% premium - The Stevanato - SVM Automatik transaction is an outlier and should be excluded from the analysis - The Mid EV/EBITDA multiple is the average of the High and Low multiples - Gerresheimer recently completed a capital raise that is not reflected in the base case, issuing10 million shares at €30.00 per share - Gerresheimer used €200M of the proceeds raised to acquire 49% of Company Y that has €50M in EBITDA

The current standalone DCF valuation does not include synergies. In the valuation model, re-run the analysis to include synergies, integration, and transaction costs. In the accretion dilution model project, the "Synergies" and "ProForma_Combined" tabs contain these assumptions. 1. Update the vauation model "Project_Rheingold_Valuation_Model(final)" 2. Implement One-Time Integration Costs (After-Tax), Transaction Costs (After-Tax), and EBITDA Synergy (pre-tax) into the DCF analysis, maintaining all existing DCF assumptions. 3. Report back for me: "Sum of PV of FCF (2026-2030)", "PV of Terminal Value", "Enterprise Value", "Implied EV/EBITDA(2025E)", "Implied EV/Revenue(2025E)". 4. Round all final monetary values (millions) and multiples to one decimal place.

Calculate the incremental Enterprise Value the Gerresheimer acquisition will add to the Aptar Group. Only reference the board presentation. Assume multiples for The Aptar Group remain constant and reference the acquisition multiple of 4.5x for Gerresheimer to arrive at the acquisition price. Use 2025E EBITDA. Do not incorporate synergies. Express your answer as a message right here. Give numbers in USD million, rounded to one decimal point.

Create a new Spreadsheet for me. Please compute a new Adjusted EBITDA value for the following companies: West Pharmaceutical, Stevanato Group, Schlott Pharma, Berry Global, Aptar Group using the board presentation, by taking the peer group median EBITDA margin and the corresponding revenue values. Multiply the Adjusted EBITDA values by the peer group median EBITDA multiple to derive a new Enterprise Value for each company. Report back the values. Display all margins and multiples to one decimal place and revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, and EVs to the nearest whole number, expressed in $mm.

Calculate the 2030E discounted EV/Revenue multiples for West Pharmaceutical, Stevanato Group, Schott Pharma, and Aptar Group. Reference the valuation model on the "Trading Comps" tab. Note that the financial and valuation metrics reflect 2025E assumptions. For each company, assume that the long-term revenue growth rate starting in 2026E is equal to its FY23 - FY24 YOY net sales growth rate, and the discount rates are as follows: West Pharmaceutical -> Reference WST 2024 10K for revenue growth -> Discount Rate: 9.4% Stevanato Group -> Reference Stevanto 2024 20-F for revenue growth -> Discount Rate: 8.8% Schott Pharma -> Reference Schott 2024 annual report for revenue growth -> Discount Rate: 10.0% Aptar Group -> Reference ATR 2024 10K for revenue growth -> Discount Rate: 7.4% Round the final output to one decimal and express it as a multiple. Print out what you find for me in here.

We just received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regarding our text marketing campaign to promote our reverse mortgage product. The interrogatories indicate that we utilized an automated telephone dialing system to send text messages to 78,000 seniors without securing their express written consent in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). 6,430 of those seniors opted out of text communications previously, 526 are on the Do Not Call Registry, 1000 were texted by a third-party marketing agency we hired to promote the product, and 650 were texted customers of SLL being notified of a data breach. I anticipate that we will be fined and that the fine will include both “willful or knowing” and “National Do Not Call Registry” violations. Please calculate the total maximum amount that SLL will be fined (based on the current fine amounts in December 2025) and send it back to me. Also break down the fine into its "National Do Not Call Registry" and TCPA components. If needed, round the amounts to the nearest dollar. Concisely explain your reasoning. Just print the answer straight back here.

HarborView requires all customer documents to be sent to their offices in the Cayman Islands headquarters, including information of Hong Kong customers. We’ve also already sent them documents as part of our due diligence – please see the transaction/deal documents on file. Can you please draft a brief memo (just a few paragraphs) explaining whether consent is required to transfer the customer’s data and, if so, whether SecureBox or HarborView is obligated to erase any or all transferred records? Please state your reason based on any documents on file as well as relevant laws such as Hong Kong’s “Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance" (PDPO). Also, please explain whether we need a data transfer agreement for any relevant jurisdiction. Write your reply back to me straight in here, just giving me the body of the memo. PS: For our transaction docs, if multiple versions of the same document exist, please assume the most recent version (denoted by a version number at the end of the file name) was the executed version, unless there is a copy with a file name that indicates the document is an executed version.

We have received a claim from Thomas Whitaker’s counsel asserting that Magnolia breached its obligations by failing to provide weekly communication to Mr. Whitaker's family. Provide the strongest argument that Magnolia has no contractual obligation to provide weekly care updates, and the family's strongest counterargument, in no more than four sentences. Reply back to me in here and describe what you find.

In the Accretion / Dilution Model, use the capital structure and shares outstanding assumptions for Solventum (SOLV) to calculate levered free cash flow and price per share. Specifically, use the following incremental assumptions: - Revenue Growth Rate: 2.0% beginning in FY25E through the end of the forecast period FY29E - SOLV Interest Rate: 5.50% to forecast interest expense - Other expense (income), net: Remains $0.00 in each period - Cost of Equity: Use the average of cost of equity of the three comps used in the WACC calculation (Exclude Zimmer Biomet) - Capex: 110.0% of D&A beginning in FY25E through the end of the forecast period FY29E With all that, calculate the implied price per share to 2 decimal places. Reply straight back to me here.

Compare the average tenure of Solventum's board members to the average of its peers' board members (excluding Solventum). Give their average tenure. Then, state which is larger and by how many years. Use the data available in: BLCO DEF14A 2025, 5Form DEF 14A for GE Healthcare Technologies INC filed 04:10:202, PEN Form DEF 14A 2025, ZBH DEF14A 2025, and March 21, 2025 - DEF 14A SOLV. Print your answer back here. Follow these assumptions: 1. Solventum's peers and/or competitors are considered to be those companies listed in the comps folder 2. The competitor average is calculated using all director tenures individually, and not by averaging the averages of each company 3. Average tenure should be presented in years, rounded to 2 decimal place 4. If a member of a company's board of directors was a member prior to a spin-off of the company, the tenure starts on the year of the spinoff 5. Nominated board candidates that have not yet served are considered to have 0 years and 0 months of tenure 6. Tenure for each individual board member should be calculated based on filing date of the source doc and to the nearest year and month before subsequent calculations. Assume tenure began at the midpoint of the year/month stated if an exact date is not given.

Using the merger model and 0000066740-25-000089, please calculate: 1. The Number of Shares Repurchased. 2. The Revised Enterprise Value. 3. The Revised EV/EBITDA multiple for 3M. 4. The Revised P/E ratio for 3M. Present all monetary values in million dollars, rounded to nearest million. Round the number of shares, ratios and percentages to two decimal places. Print your reply back here as a short message. Assumptions and guidance for deliverables: - Note that debt to equity ratio for 3M as of end September 2025 can be calculated using 3M Total Equity in the other file. - Assume that 3M Share price dropped by 8% before the buyback and remained flat after that. - Assume that the amount of proceeds from sale of Solventum are used to paydown debt by 3M to bring debt to equity ratio down to 2.60x. - The left over proceeds from sale of Solventum after paying debt is used by 3M to repurchase shares. - Assume that EBITDA can be adjusted to 2025E EBITDA by multiplying it with 1.05 for simplicity. - For the enterprise value working, use the cash in tab "Assumptions S2". - For the Revised P/E ratio, use the TTM net income given in "Assumptions S2" tab.

Calculate the intrinsic value per share of Solventum based on these assumptions. Use the accretion dilution model. - Lower the gross margin % to 52% for the forecast period 2026E through 2029E. - Change Research & Development expenses as % of Sales to 15% wherein the discounted cashflow is higher than $1,100 mm in the preceding year, and to 10% wherein the discounted cashflow is lower than $1,100 mm in the preceding year for the years 2026E through 2029E. - Remove the comparable Koninklijke Philips from the WACC calculation. - Change the terminal growth rate to 2.0%. - Convert fixed CAPEX to a % of sales, and project using the last 3-year moving average to calculate it for the years 2025E through 2029E. - Update the discounting with 1/12 for 2025E, given that we are at the start of Dec 2025. Adjust the future years discounting convention accordingly. - Pull shares outstanding and Net debt from the "Assumptions S1" tab. Round the final deliverable to two decimal places and express in $ terms. Give me your response right here.

Prepare an analysis regarding Livyra's Bencontra promotional activities. Take a look at the case file, paying close attention to the email communications as well as the relevant case law, statutes and other legal guidance. Also, use the attached document. Please provide a brief overview of the relevant laws then address whether the company faces potential liability under the law by identifying emails and violations at issue. Output your assessment as a message to me here.

If BBDC was to merge with TPVG, what would be the pro forma industry exposure for Business Services (investments at fair value as a percentage of total, based on end of September 30, 2025 data)? Use the latest 10-Q reports for each company. Consider only industry categories referring explicitly to business services in the category name. Within TPVG's combined "Business Products and Services" category, assume that only Muon is not a services provider. Present the exposure as a % to 2 decimal places. Give me my answers back in here.

Using the comps file, refine the BBDC peer set and rebuild the valuation range as of 18 Nov 2025. Use operating data for the 9M to end of 2025Q3 to derive implied prices. 1. Exclude all peers with AUM > 5,000 (values expressed in millions in the file) and exclude TSLX, GBDC, and TRIN from the peer set. 2. For the remaining peers, calculate for P/NAV, P/E, and P/Sales: 25th percentile (P25), Median, and 75th percentile (P75). 3. Derive BBDC valuation cases: Bear = P25, Base = Median, Bull = P75. 4. For each case, compute the implied equity value under each multiple, average the implied values to get the final Bear/Base/Bull equity value, and calculate % upside vs BBDC’s equity value as of 11/18/25. Output a short message with the final Bear/Base/Bull equity values and % upside for each. Give $ rounded to thousands and no decimal places, and percentages and multiples to 2 decimal places.

Recalculate "Additional paid-in capital" that factors in share buy-back of 10 million shares by BBDC. Print the answer as a reply to me here. Assume that the transaction was financed using cash on the balance sheet. Additional optional Debt is triggered only if cash drops below $10 million keeping balance sheet cash at a minimum of $10 million. Use the 9M 2025 account. Round monetary values to the nearest USD thousand.

What if BBDC change target and achieve a partial merger with FIDUS Investment Corporation (FDUS) instead of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG)? Use the FDUS SEC filings as of Q3 2025 and Q4 2024 to modify the 9M 2025 section of the income sheet in the merger model - Input the target share price of $19.21. Set the Financial account to "9M TTM 2025". - Assume that the BDDC / FDUS EBIT synergies will be 1.75x greater than the potential BBDC / TVPG EBIT synergies. Recalculate the pro-forma EBIT, the net investment income before tax, the net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations, and the net investment income per share. Round the net investment income per share to two decimal places. Apart from the net investment income per share, present the results rounded to USD thousands. Print your answer back here.

Consider FDUS as a potential target, use the last 6-month median share price as of 11/19/2025 in the FDUS file and the Nine Months Ended September 30 account from the FDUS 9/30 10Q. Your task is to calculate the Exchange Ratio for FDUS, % Ownership BBDC and % Ownership FDUS using the 9M 2025 account in the model using FDUS data. Give me your reply here. Round ratios to the nearest 3 decimal places, round percentage to the nearest 2 decimal places.

Calculate the accretion / dilution of both BBDC and TVPG shareholders, sensitized for different Cash consideration and Bid Premium. Edit the existing merger model and add two sensitivity analyses: one showing BBDC accretion/dilution and one showing TVPG accretion/dilution, each sensitized to bid premium (10% and 20%) and cash consideration (10% and 15%). Assume an increase of EBIT Synergies by 480bps and a 210bps decrease in post-deal bidder share price downside. All output values should be in %, rounded to 2 decimal places.

If BBDC had effectively merged with TPVG at the end of September 2025, what would be the expected synergies (in dollars) in one and a half years post-closing? You can assume the synergies equal 10% of TPVG's run-rate SG&A, income incentive fee waiver, and management and incentive fees based on the company’s financials for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, annualized, and grown at a CAGR of 5%. Please use the company's 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. Write your answer back to me here.

Use the BBDC valuation model as a template and a prepare a full valuation of SLR INVESTMENT CORP. (SLRC) as of FY 2024. - Use the median of peer trading multiples - Retrieve the SLRC’s required data from the attached SLRC 10K files. - Use the share price as of December 31, 2024 ($16.16) for SLRC's actual equity value. Calculate SLRC’s Implied Equity Value according to the following methods: - P / NAV, P / E, P / Sales, and NAV / Share I want you to compute the Relative Premium / (Discount) of SLRC’s actual equity value. Then, determine the lowest and highest Implied Equity Value from all the valuation methods. Round to the nearest unit for the lowest and highest Implied Equity Value in thousands dollars. Round to 2 decimal places for the Relative Premium / (Discount) results in %. Print the correct information back to me here.

Evaluate acquisition of WhiteHorse Finance (WHF) by editing the ‘Target-TPVG’ tab in merger model using WHF’s 2024 financials. Use a share price of $7.20 (as of 11/26/2025). Output two sensitivity analyses on the Post-Deal Pro Forma tab in the merger model file, showing: NAV per share (2 decimal places), NII per share accretion (%, 2 decimal places) for the WHF transaction. In each case, show analyses for: - Bid Premiums: 30% and 35%. - Cash Consideration Mix: 30% and 40%.

Assume BBDC's share to fall by 5% and TPVG's share rose by 12% post-deal and pre-issuance. The final proposed ownership split is BBDC - 75% and TPVG - 25%, maintain other assumptions constant. Create a new tab in the merger model. Calculate the "Cash Consideration", "Total Consideration", "Cash Consideration per share" and "Total Consideration per share" based on the proposed final ownership split, and the shares change Round monetary calculations to the nearest USD thousands, and round per share data to the nearest USD 2 decimal places.

To evaluate where economic value is created in the BBDC & TPVG merger, use the comps and merger models to build a four step value creation bridge. Write your reply to me here. Set the merger model to the 9M TTM 2025 account. Return the incremental change in value (%) between each scenario, the Pro Forma Implied EV after dilution, and total value creation vs standalone % (all to 2 decimal places). Here are the Scenarios: - 1. BBDC Standalone Implied Equity Value based on LTM NAV, LTM NII, and LTM Sales from the valuation model and median P/NAV, P/E, and P/S multiples on all comps from the comps file; - 2. Standalone + Synergies Implied Equity Value using run-rate synergies from the merger model; - 3. Add TPVG NAV Contribution (Pre-Dilution) using TPVG’s standalone NAV from the merger model; - 4. Pro Forma Implied Equity Value (After Dilution) using PF NAV, PF NII, PF Sales, and PF shares from the merger model.

Use "Comp Analysis – Modify" as a clean version of Comp Analysis. Replace peers WhiteHorse Finance (WHF) and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC corps. (TPVG) and replace with SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD) and Stellus Capital Investment Corp (SCM). Use the attached SEC filings to complete the task. Retrieve the AUM, NAV / Share and Debt / Equity as of September 30, 2025, to complete the analysis. Calculate the mean and median for each key metrics considering BDCs with a Market Cap in the $350M to $900M range only. Get your answer back to me right here. Present the AUM in $M. All the final numbers must be rounded to 2 decimal places.

Assume that TVPG raised additional $70 million mezzanine capital ($30 million - equity capital raise from it's current shareholders at a discounted issue price of $6.0 per share and $40 million - debt capital raise at 6% interest rate), and the merger uses 50% cash consideration. Task: Using the 9M TTM 2025 account, recalculate the "Pro Forma Debt" and "Pro Forma Combined Equity Value". Print both values back in your reply. - Assume end of financial year is December 31st, debt issued date was March 31, 2025 - There are zero fees associated with the issues - Round all monetary values to the nearest USD thousand.

Using the merger model, assume BBDC's share price falls by 15% after deal announcement but before the new share issuance to TPVG shareholders. Using the 9M TTM 2025 financial account, calculate the revised pro forma balance sheet. Send me a reply with the following pro forma balance sheet line items: Total assets, Total liabilities, Total net assets, Total liabilities and net assets and Nav per share All dollar values in $’000 (whole numbers), except for NAV per share which should be rounded to two decimal places.

Using the merger model, recalculate the post-deal pro forma balance sheet in the “Post-Deal Proforma” tab under the following assumptions: - 50% cash consideration - 20% of balance sheet cash is used in the transaction - BBDC share price declines by 5% post-deal - New shares are issued at the updated (post-decline) share price Print back for me here: 1. Pro forma NAV per share 2. Pro forma Debt-to-Equity ratio Round both the per-share figure and the ratio to two decimal places.

Assume that TVPG raised additional $70 million mezzanine capital ($30 million - equity capital raise from it's current shareholders at a discounted issue price of $6.0 per share and $40 million - debt capital raise at 6% interest rate), and the merger uses 50% cash consideration financed with 80% of cash on balance sheet - Using the 9M TTM 2025 account, recalculate the "Exchange Ratio for TVPG Shareholders", "% Value Accretion/(Dilution) to BBDC shareholders", and "% Value Accretion/(Dilution) to TPVG shareholders" in the merger model and return results. Assume the end of financial year is December 31st, debt issued date was the first day of the calendar year and zero fees associated with the issues. Round all percentage calculations to the nearest 2 decimal places, and round ratio to the nearest 3 decimal places. Respond with the information in a message.

Based on the attached table, with the asking price for each company, which competitors would have a higher 2024 ARR multiple than CompliSure even if their SMB customer count declined by 75%? State the updated 2024 revenue ARR multiple for each of those companies. Use the KPI dashboard, expanded financial dataset, and competitors client share files along with the attached files for this analysis. You can write your response back to me in here.

Create a new slide pptx, summarizing the comparable SaaS deals' target company name, purchase price, ARR, and ARR multiple. Include all targets for which we have an individual case study and use only publicly disclosed data. Round multiples to one decimal point and, for financial values, provide numbers in millions rounded to the nearest million or, if above 1 billion, in billions with one decimal place. Get insights from the comparable SaaS deals, the internal memo about valuation ranges and negotiation levers, and the case studies about Beacon, Stuzo, TASK, Claap and Statsig.